Corporate Valuation, Investment Management

November 1, 2021

Public Alt Asset Managers Have Nearly Doubled in Value Over the Last Year

Hedge Funds and Private Equity Firms Capitalize on Market Volatility and Growing Investor Appetite for Alt Asset Products

Industry Overview and History

Over the last year, alternative asset managers have bested the market and most other categories of investment management firms by a considerable margin. Favorable market conditions, heightened volatility, strong investment returns, and growing interest from institutional investors are the primary drivers behind the sector’s recent rally. Our alt manager index actually doubled from October of 2020 to August of this year before giving back some of these gains during the market downturn last month.

Before this uptick, many alternative asset managers had struggled over the last several years. Asset outflows, the rising popularity of passive products, fee pressure, and underperformance relative to broader market returns had caused many hedge funds and PE firms to lag other investment management sectors. Industry valuations appear to have bottomed out with the market collapse during the first quarter of last year and have since rebounded. Growing investor appetite for risky assets with purported diversification benefits has fueled a fairly substantial turnaround for the sector over the last eighteen months or so. Current pricing is close to the 52-week high, and forward multiples are noticeably lower than LTM multiples, suggesting peaked valuations and expected earnings increases over the next twelve months. While hedge funds have underperformed since the Financial Crisis (the S&P 500 index has dwarfed the performance of hedge funds as measured by the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index since 2009), recent volatility has improved their performance on a relative basis. Hedge fund capital typically lags its underlying fund performance, so the market seems to be anticipating that higher inflows in the coming months as investors reallocate their portfolios in light of recent performance. Alternative assets often serve to either increase diversification or enhance portfolio returns. In a near zero interest rate environment, institutional investors have sought return-generating assets. Over the last couple of years, pension funds have started diversifying their portfolios to include alternative investments in order to chase higher risk, higher return assets. It is more difficult for the average investor to gain exposure to alternative assets due to significant minimum investment requirements. While some efforts have been made to expand distribution to the retail market, institutional investors are still the primary target market for alternative managers.
Over the last couple of years, pension funds have started diversifying their portfolios to include alternative investments in order to chase higher risk, higher return assets.

Over the last several years, alternative asset managers have been largely successful at securing a spot in institutional investors’ portfolios. In terms of diversification, investors have started positioning themselves for longer term volatility due to the pandemic and a slowing IPO market. While investor interest in uncorrelated asset classes such as alternatives fell during the longest bull market run in history (2009-20), recent volatility has pushed investors back to the asset class.

Franklin Resources’s (ticker: BEN) recently announced purchase of private equity firm Lexington Partners for $1.75 billion is illustrative of growing interest from more traditional asset managers in the alt space.

Practice Management

Today, the main priority for most alternative asset managers is raising assets. Assets follow performance and fee reduction, especially in the alternatives space, are the most consequential ways to attract fund flow. After a decade of lackluster performance, alternative managers have had no choice but to look to price reduction to bring in new assets. Amidst fee pressure, alterative managers are deviating from the typical “2 and 20” model.

While traditional asset managers have been able to reduce fees by achieving some measure of scale, alternative managers must be careful to not sacrifice specialization. Alternative managers have seen some success utilizing technology in the front office or outsourcing certain functions in order to reduce overhead and spare time for management to focus on asset raising.

Summary

Despite improving performance over the last year or so, the alt asset sector continues to face many headwinds, including fee pressure and expanding index opportunities. While the idea of passively managed alternative asset products seems like an oxymoron, a number of funds exist with the goal of imitating private equity returns. Innovative products are being introduced to the investing public every day. And while there is currently no passive substitute to alternatives, we do believe that the industry will continue to be influenced by many of the same pressures that traditional asset managers are facing today, despite the recent uptick in alt manager valuations.

Continue Reading

When RIA Owners Disagree on Value
When RIA Owners Disagree on Value

Choosing the Appraiser, the Process, and the Rules of Engagement

Valuation disputes among RIA owners require more than a defensible appraisal—they also require a clear process for selecting a qualified, independent appraiser and establishing fair rules of engagement. Thoughtful dispute-resolution provisions can help parties reach a credible conclusion even when perspectives on value differ.
RIA Valuation Insights Blog Investment Management
Read Now about When RIA Owners Disagree on Value
Mercer Capital to Sponsor the Association of Trust Organizations 2026 Annual Meeting
Mercer Capital to Sponsor the Association of Trust Organizations 2026 Annual Meeting
Mercer Capital is pleased to sponsor the Association of Trust Organizations’ 2026 Annual Meeting, taking place September 21-23, 2026, at the Grand Hyatt Deer Valley in Park City, Utah. Matt Crow, Brooks Hamner, and Zach Milam will attend on behalf of the firm.The 2026 Annual Meeting is a 1.5-day conference designed exclusively for the trust industry and will feature more than 13 hours of roundtables, panels, and networking. One of the featured sessions is Tuesday afternoon’s Session VI, “What Makes a Trust Company Worth More? Building Value Before the Deal,” which will be moderated by Matt Crow. The panel will explore the factors that drive valuation, how buyers and sellers evaluate opportunities, and what firms can do today to maximize enterprise value.Matt Crow, CFA, ASA, is the CEO of Mercer Capital and leads the firm’s Investment Management Industry team. He works with RIAs, independent trust companies, broker-dealers, and investment consulting firms on valuation matters related to corporate planning and reorganization, transactions, employee stock ownership plans, tax issues, and intangible asset valuations. Matt is also a frequent contributor to Mercer Capital’s RIA Valuation Insights blog.Brooks Hamner, CFA, ASA, is a Senior Vice President and a senior member of Mercer Capital’s Investment Management Industry team. He provides valuation services to RIAs, independent trust companies, asset managers, wealth management firms, broker-dealers, and investment consultants, and he also advises clients buying or selling their business.Zach Milam, CFA, is a Vice President and a senior member of Mercer Capital’s Investment Management Industry team. He has experience in corporate planning and reorganizations, financial reporting, fairness opinions, litigation support, employee stock ownership plans, and estate and gift tax planning and compliance matters.Mercer Capital regularly works with RIAs, independent trust companies, broker-dealers, and other investment management clients on valuation and advisory matters, and the firm looks forward to connecting with attendees in Park City. Visit the conference website to learn more about this year’s Annual Meeting: https://trustorgs.com/annual-meeting/.
The Margin RIA Buyers Actually Underwrite
The Margin RIA Buyers Actually Underwrite

Why the Post-Closing Cost Structure Matters More Than the Historical Margin

RIA buyers often focus less on a seller’s historical margin than on the earnings the business can generate after closing under the buyer’s operating model. Differences in integration strategy, cost structure, and platform capabilities can lead buyers to underwrite materially different margins and values.
RIA Valuation Insights Blog Investment Management
Read Now about The Margin RIA Buyers Actually Underwrite

Cart

Your cart is empty