Transaction Advisory, Oil & Gas

May 11, 2020

2020 Commodity Prices Upend 2019 E&P Bankruptcies

The recent historic decline in oil prices has strained the balance sheets of E&P companies.  Whiting Petroleum Corporation, the first publicly traded U.S. E&P company to declare bankruptcy in 2020, announced its Chapter 11 reorganization process on April 1.  More are expected to follow.

Despite a much more benign commodity price environment of ~$50-$60/bbl in 2019, a number of E&P companies declared bankruptcy last year and have seen their reorganization processes derailed in 2020 as a result of low oil prices.

Sanchez Energy DIP Financing Impaired

Sanchez Energy filed for bankruptcy in August 2019, citing a misalignment between the company’s capital structure and the “continued low commodity price environment.”  At the time of filing, Sanchez had approximately $2.3 billion of debt outstanding, according to Haynes Boone.

As part of the bankruptcy process, Sanchez secured $200 million of debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing.  DIP financing is generally senior to the company’s other indebtedness, and thus usually recovered in full.  However, in light of commodity price declines caused by COVID-19’s energy demand destruction, Sanchez is only worth an estimated $85 million according to the court-approved reorganization plan.  This implies a substantial impairment of the DIP financing (to say nothing of the other $2.3 billion of debt).

Despite the approved reorganization plan, the ultimate ownership of the company is still in question.

Alta Mesa Sale Terms Revised

Alta Mesa announced its bankruptcy in September, a month after Sanchez, citing a need to “reorganize its capital structure.”  According to Haynes Boone, Alta Mesa’s debt totaled $871 million.

Alta Mesa received a $310 million stalking horse bid on December 31 from a joint venture between Mach Resources (an E&P company) and Bayou City Energy (a private equity firm).  The joint venture won the subsequent auction in January 2020, bidding $320 million, but was unable to secure the necessary financing amid the initial stages of the Saudi/Russian price war in March.  The sale ultimately went through, but at a $100 million discount.

EP Energy Restructuring Plan Scrapped

EP Energy, an Eagle Ford and Permian-focused producer, filed for bankruptcy in October.  The company was spun out from El Paso Corp. during 2012 in a leveraged buyout (LBO) led by Apollo and subsequently taken public in 2014.  The LBO left EP Energy with a massive debt balance, which stood at $7.3 billion per Haynes Boone.

EP Energy’s restructuring plan was approved on March 6, the same day Saudi Arabia and Russia failed to come to terms on an OPEC+ supply cut.  It soon fell apart, as Apollo and other financial backers pulled out.

The company has submitted a motion requesting an extension, which would give EP Energy until October 31, 2020 to file a revised restructuring plan.

Approach Resources Buyer Backs Out

Approach Resources was the last U.S. public E&P to file for bankruptcy in 2019, seeking to explore strategic alternatives including “the restructuring of its balance sheet or the sale of its business” as stated in its November press release.  The company received a stalking horse bid of $192.5 million from Alpine Energy Capital in February.  The court approved the sale in early March.  Later in the month, Alpine announced that it was terminating the agreement.  The approach subsequently sought to force Alpine to complete the purchase.

The matter has not yet been resolved.

Conclusion

Recent commodity price volatility has driven certain E&P producers to file for bankruptcy and has prevented several more from emerging.  While prices have bounced back from recent lows, they remain below breakeven costs for many producers.  As such, we expect to see continued bankruptcy filings and protracted restructuring processes.

If you want to learn more about the valuation side of the bankruptcy process, and how we at Mercer can use our years of experience in bankruptcy and the oil & gas industry to help you emerge from Chapter 11 well-prepared for future success, contact one of our valuation analysts for a confidential discussion.

Continue Reading

NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.
Industry Spotlight: Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Industry Spotlight | Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Earlier this month, I was in Western Oklahoma for a trial. Surrounded by the wide-open Great Plains and the unmistakable presence of oil and gas infrastructure, it was impossible not to think about the industry’s influence on the region. A few people asked me if I had watched the acclaimed show, Landman, and as I hadn't, I started the series on my flights home.
Just Released: Q4 2025 Oil & Gas Industry Newsletter
Just Released: Q4 2025 Oil & Gas Industry Newsletter

Region Focus: Haynesville Shale

Overall, the Appalachian basin enters late-2025 on firmer footing than a year ago, characterized by stable production, recovering equity performance, and improving infrastructure fundamentals. Continued progress on export capacity and incremental LNG demand should provide a constructive backdrop for basin economics heading into 2026.

Cart

Your cart is empty