Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

March 1, 2017

Are S&P Energy Stock Valuations Really Crazy Right Now?

A few days ago the Wall Street Journal published an article discussing what the author described as “crazy” stock valuations, and in particular the inflated valuations of oil and gas stocks from the perspective of operating earnings ratios.

“The energy sector stands at more than 30 times Thomson Reuters IBES’s estimate of operating earnings over the next 12 months, higher than any time from when the sector data started in 1995 up to last year – when it briefly reached an extreme of almost 60 times.”

The article also mentions that the S&P 500 as a whole is trading at almost 18 times estimated future operating margins.  This got us to thinking - In light of what has transpired over the past two plus years in the energy sector, could it really be that stocks are overvalued?  That certainly hasn’t been the sentiment that we hear from our clients.  Maybe we’re all wrong?  If so, what could be driving this?

While we certainly are believers that value is driven by future operating earnings, and that earnings in the energy sector have fallen precipitously since 2014, is this all that determines the market’s pricing of the S&P 500 energy sector?  As we reflect on this for a moment, a few additional considerations came to mind that may explain these “crazy” valuations more fully.

Anticipated Tax Relief

One consideration not captured in an operating earnings ratio that markets are using to impact values is expectations for future tax reform.  Since the new administration has been inaugurated the stock market has risen significantly.  Clearly, one of the sources of this market optimism is the platform of tax reform – including corporate taxes.  There are a number of sources describing what this new structure may look like.  One particularly insightful article was written by Jason B. Freeman in the January/February issue of Today’s CPA titled "Tax Reform Under a Trump Administration".

President Trump’s plan would drop the corporate tax rate from 35% (among the highest in the world) to 15% or 20%.  This would immediately bring tax relief at a corporate level and boost earnings.  Judging by the equity market’s early reaction this morning to Mr. Trump’s State of the Union address, in which he highlighted this issue, anticipation of this action is fueling higher stock prices.

Anticipated Regulation Reform

The market may also be considering the future impact President Trump’s regulation reform.  While there is much uncertainty surrounding the future regulation of the oil and gas industry, President Trump ran as a friend to the oil and gas sector and promised to reduce regulations on the industry in order to boost the U.S. economy. Additionally, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt was confirmed as the Environmental Protection Agency administrator.  Pruitt has openly opposed the EPA, which is one of the main regulators of the oil and gas industry.  Looser regulations on the oil and gas industry could reduce operating expenses associated with meeting current regulation and could provide new opportunities for the industry.

Growth Underpinnings

The energy sector has been hit hard, but a less visible aspect of the WSJ article’s premise is that there are signs that the energy sector’s depression in earnings may be short lived and the market is forecasting a rebound.  Consider this, the price of oil is at or near decade lows and earnings are sensitive to commodity prices, particularly when the price of oil hovers close to breakeven costs for producers (which it is currently).  Slight upward changes in oil and gas prices could have significant upward impacts on profits.  In addition, due to the drop in commodity prices, the industry has responded by innovating and pushing costs downward for drilling shale wells.

Reserves Reserves Reserves!

Another aspect that can’t be detected by an operating earnings ratio is how awash in reserves we currently are.  U.S. crude oil inventories have hit all-time highs, and demonstrate how poised the energy sector is to respond to manufacturing and consumer growth.

us-crude-oil-inventories Reserves are the foundation of value for E&P companies which is why this metric is oftentimes much more important than mere earnings.  It shows the potential for earnings 5 to 10 years or even 20 years down the road, which is something one year earnings estimates do not consider.  Better ratios to consider here are equity values relative to daily or annual production or total proved reserves.

The Big Picture

At any given moment it can be hard to say if equities, sectors or companies are “overvalued”.  Valuation is relative to begin with and ultimately at a point in time the “value” is what market participants will pay.  As it pertains to oil and gas companies, it appears clear that earnings are low as the sector better copes with $50-55 oil and $3 gas.  However, the market appears to see brighter days ahead, beyond 2017 and that confidence along with optimism for tax reform, operating efficiencies, and positioning for future growth are buoying prices.  Perhaps investors aren’t crazy after all.  Of course that’s just my opinion….I could be wrong.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty