Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

October 9, 2019

Bakken May Lack Flash, But Has Fundamentals

The economics of oil and gas production vary by region. Mercer Capital focuses on trends in the Eagle Ford, Permian, Bakken, and Appalachia plays. The cost of producing oil and gas depends on the geological makeup of the reserve, depth of reserve, and cost to transport the raw crude to market. We can observe different costs in different regions depending on these factors. In this post, we take a closer look at the Bakken Shale.

Production and Activity Levels

Bakken production grew approximately 10% year-over-year through September.  While this growth rate lags behind the Permian, it is in line with production growth in Appalachia and meaningfully bests the Eagle Ford.

The rig count in the Bakken at the end of September was unchanged from the year prior at 53.  While not impressive at first glance, the total U.S. rig count declined nearly 20% over the same period.  Eagle Ford, Permian, and Appalachia rig counts declined 22%, 15%, and 17%, respectively. The Bakken has also seen the biggest gain in new-well production per rig relative to our other coverage basins.  While this metric doesn’t cover the full life cycle of a well, it is a signal of the increasing efficiency of operators in the area.  New well production per rig in the Bakken increased 29% on a year-over-year basis through September, compared to increases of 2%, 12%, and 7% in the Eagle Ford, Permian, and Appalachia, respectively.

Financial Performance

Bakken E&P operator financial performance was a mixed bag over the past year.  Canada’s Crescent Point Energy (CPG) was the only positive performer of the Bakken-focused operators, up 23% year-over-year through September.   While down 16%, Hess outperformed the broader S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (XOP).  However, this was likely attributable (at least in part) to positive developments out of Guyana, where Hess has a 30% interest in the massive Stabroek block.  The Stabroek block is one of the largest offshore oil discoveries in the past decade, with more than 6 billion boe of discovered, recoverable resource.

Continental, Whiting, and Oasis all unperformed the broader E&P index during the past year, with Whiting down a notable 85%.  Oasis is funding its Permian development program with cash flows generated from its Bakken position, a strategy that has fallen out of favor with investors who now seek capital discipline and free cash flow generation.  Whiting is down largely on concerns regarding leverage and inventory life.  All three saw margin compression, with Whiting’s EBITDAX per boe down nearly 30% year-over-year. Despite this financial performance, the Bakken hasn’t been impacted by the recent batch of bankruptcies that have afflicted the Mid-Con (Alta Mesa, White Star), Eagle Ford (Sanchez, EP Energy), and even the Permian (Halcon).  However, Whiting did announce a major restructuring in which it will terminate 254 positions (around one-third of the company’s workforce).  As a result, the company anticipates approximately $50 million in annual savings.

Commodity Prices Largely Unchanged in Aftermath of Saudi Attack

On September 14, a missile attack on Saudi Arabian oil production facilities took out 5.7 million barrels a day of production, amounting to about 5% of global production.  Both WTI and Brent crude prices surged more than 10% in the immediate aftermath of the attack.

However, the price reaction was short-lived, as the Saudis were able to bring 2 million bbl/d of production back online within days, with the remainder expected to be back online within weeks.  WTI and Brent prices ended September lower than on the day prior to the attack. Realized pricing in the Bakken has improved markedly relative to last fall, when a combination of Midwest refinery turnarounds and a glut of Canadian production sent the Clearbrook Bakken / WTI differential to more than $20/bbl.  At the end of September, the differential stood at approximately $2.50/bbl.  While thinly traded, basis futures indicate expected differentials of $2.50 to $4.30/bbl over the next several years.

Infrastructure Issues

The Dakota Access Pipeline largely alleviated crude takeaway constraints out of the basin.  And with a proposed expansion of the pipeline, the announced Liberty Pipeline, and excess crude-by-rail capacity, E&P operators likely won’t have issues getting crude to end markets.

However, both Whiting and Oasis indicated that issues with natural gas processing infrastructure adversely impacted performance during the quarter.

In the Q2 earnings call, Whiting CEO Brad Holly stated,

To minimize flaring, we are producing some wells at constrained oil rates, while we focus on increasing gas capture through the installation of mobile combustion units, building out gathering systems, and completing our ray gas processing plant. Constraints also impacted the pace of planned operating activity.

Oasis CEO Tommy Nusz put a finer point on his commentary, specifically stating that downtime at the company’s Wild Basin gas complex reduced 2Q19 production by 3,000 boe/d.

These constraints should moderate, though, as additional natural gas infrastructure comes online in late 2019 and early 2020.

MLP Simplification Trend Continues

The recent trend of MLP simplifications, driven in part by tax reform, FERC policy changes, cost of capital considerations, and a desire to reach a broader investor base, continues.  Hess Midstream Partners (HESM) announced that it is acquiring Hess Infrastructure Partners (HIP) in a $6.2 billion transaction.  HIP owns HESM’s General Partner (GP) units and Incentive Distribution Rights (IDRs), as well as an 80% interest in HESM’s oil and gas midstream assets.  Unlike most simplifications that have occurred once GP/IDR distributions are “high in the splits” (with the GP/IDR holder typically taking 50% of incremental distributions above a certain threshold), HESM was only at the 25% split level.

Fellow Bakken midstream operator Oasis Midstream Partners remains on a rapidly shortening list of MLPs that still have IDRs.

Conclusion

Now that the Bakken’s crude infrastructure issues have been (somewhat) resolved, the basin has seemed to take a backseat to other areas in terms of news coverage and investor attention.  While the Bakken hasn’t kept up with the Permian’s growth, its static (rather than declining) rig count, higher oil to gas ratio, and sufficient crude takeaway capacity bode well for the basin relative to its domestic counterparts.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space in both conventional and unconventional plays in North America, and around the world.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Continue Reading

Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.
Industry Spotlight: Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Industry Spotlight | Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Earlier this month, I was in Western Oklahoma for a trial. Surrounded by the wide-open Great Plains and the unmistakable presence of oil and gas infrastructure, it was impossible not to think about the industry’s influence on the region. A few people asked me if I had watched the acclaimed show, Landman, and as I hadn't, I started the series on my flights home.

Cart

Your cart is empty