Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

March 13, 2017

A Bright Spot at the Bottom of the Barrel

How has the Asphalt Industry been Affected by Depressed Oil Prices?

Asphalt and road oil are used primarily by the construction industry for roofing and waterproofing and for road construction.  Asphalt is a byproduct of petroleum refining.  During the distillation process of crude oil, asphalt does not boil off and is left as a heavy residue. Generally around 90% of crude is turned into high margin products such as gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and petrochemicals while the other 10% is converted into asphalt and other low margin products.  Petroleum refiners sell asphalt to asphalt product manufacturers who produce retail products such as asphalt paving mixtures and blocks; asphalt emulsions; prepared asphalt and tar roofing and siding products; and roofing asphalts and pitches, coating, and cement.

products-made-barrel-crude-oil Demand for asphalt products is determined by the health of the construction industry and the level of infrastructure funding.

How has the Construction Industry Impacted Demand for Asphalt?

Spending on construction in December 2016 increased 0.2% from November 2016 and 4.2% from December 2015 to $1.18 trillion.  After several years of steady growth followed by decelerating growth in 2016, Dodge Data & Analytics forecasts total construction starts will increase by 5% in 2017 reaching $713 billion.  AIA believes that factors such as job growth, consumer confidence and low interest rates have propelled construction spending.

How has Funding for Infrastructure Impacted Demand for Asphalt?

About 93% of the 2.2 million miles of paved roads and highways in the U.S. are paved with asphalt.  Most road construction is funded by states, counties, or other federal programs.  Thus demand for asphalt and road oils are largely dependent on the level of funding available.  During the recession most local governments collected less revenue and could not afford investment in infrastructure.  Both federal and state level taxes designed to generate revenue for transportation use a per-gallon fuel tax.  Due to increasing fuel efficiency and lower gas prices, fuel taxes have generated less money. Further, the 18.4 cent-per-gallon federal gas tax has not been increased in more than twenty years and has not kept up with inflation or increasing costs.  Some states have increased their state gas tax in order to fund these programs, but funding of infrastructure over the last decade has generally been insufficient.

For the past decade, the federal government has been funding transportation for short periods of time using extensions of previous plans.   In August 2005, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was signed into law.  In July 2012, after multiple extensions of the SAFETEA-LU, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) was passed by Congress.  MAP-21 extended SAFETEA-LU for the remainder of 2012, with new provisions for FY 2013 and beyond.  Funding levels were maintained at FY 2012 levels with minor adjustments for inflation.

President Obama signed the FAST (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation) Act in December of 2015. The FAST Act provided $305 billion from 2016 to 2022 for programs to improve highways, highway and motor vehicle safety, and other critical transportation projects.  Included in this legislation is a new National Highway Freight Program which will focus most of its funding on highways.  The legislation also aims to reduce administrative and bureaucratic obstacles allowing the DOT to delegate project oversight to states on a project and programmatic basis.

While investment did modestly increase in 2016, it is likely that demand will pick up more in 2017 as projects funded by the FAST Act start being implemented.  Mike Acott, president of the National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA) said that the most significant change since the FAST Act was passed has been a pickup in resurfacing activity.  Resurfacing roads is a much cheaper alternative to repaving and many local governments were able to work the resurfacing of roads into the limits of their tight budgets.  Increased demand for repaving materials led to industry innovation and new product developments to meet this demand.

How did the Asphalt Industry Perform in 2016?

As the price of crude oil fell so did the price of asphalt sold by petroleum refineries.  Crude oil prices fell by 50% from June 2014 to January 2017 (the most recent PPI data available for asphalt) while asphalt prices fell 55% over this same time period.

PPI Asphalt from Refineries 2017 Refiner’s margins generally increased in 2015 and fell over the last year. As shown in the chart above, the movement of refined product prices lags changes in crude prices.  Thus in 2015, refiners purchased crude for cheaper prices than before but sold their products at the same prices. In 2016 however, asphalt prices began to fall and margins narrowed. Marathon reported that their asphalt operations were weaker than their “exceptionally strong” year of operations in 2015. Analysts expect the price of asphalt to increase over the next few years.  As refining technology improves refiners are able to produce more gasoline out of a barrel of oil leaving less to be made into paving grade asphalt.  This reduction in supply will likely increase asphalt prices. As the price of crude fell, refiners margins narrowed, which led to a decrease in cost of goods sold for asphalt manufacturers resulting in a pickup in earnings.  Because of the impact of transportation costs on the industry and the quick hardening time of ready mix asphalt, competition is based primarily on location and price. In general asphalt manufacturers’ margins increased in 2016 as their cost of goods fell.  Vulcan Materials, Inc. (VMC) produces aggregates and ready mix asphalt in Birmingham, Alabama.  Its asphalt mix segment’s gross profit increased 25% in 2016.  While sales volume and sales price declined by 3% and 2%, respectively the cost of goods sold decreased and expanded the Company’s gross profit margin by 4.3 percentage points. Martin Marietta (MLM), which produces aggregate and asphalt products in North Carolina, realized a 15.7% gross profit margin in its asphalt and paving segment in 2016 compared to a 12.6% margin in 2015.

How will the Asphalt Industry Perform in 2017?

Going forward investment in infrastructure is expected to increase.  After many states cut infrastructure funding, there is currently much work that needs to be done to improve the conditions of roads and highways.   As state and local government budgets have improved since the recession, it is anticipated that tax revenue available for investment in road infrastructure will expand.  Additionally, President Trump, during his campaign, pledged to invest $1 trillion in infrastructure in order to spur economic growth.   Finally, prices for cement, which is a substitute for asphalt, are expected to rise which will increase the demand for asphalt.  Overall, industry revenue is expected to increase by 2.3% over the next five years.1

Mercer Capital has significant experience valuing assets and companies in the energy and construction industries.  Our valuations have been reviewed and relied on by buyers and sellers and Big 4 Auditors. These valuations have been utilized to support valuations for IRS Estate and Gift Tax, GAAP accounting, and litigation purposes. Contact a Mercer Capital professional today to discuss your valuation needs in confidence.


End Note

1 IBIS World Report 32412: Asphalt Manufacturing in the US: October 2016

Continue Reading

Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.
Industry Spotlight: Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Industry Spotlight | Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Earlier this month, I was in Western Oklahoma for a trial. Surrounded by the wide-open Great Plains and the unmistakable presence of oil and gas infrastructure, it was impossible not to think about the industry’s influence on the region. A few people asked me if I had watched the acclaimed show, Landman, and as I hadn't, I started the series on my flights home.

Cart

Your cart is empty