Transaction Advisory, Oil & Gas

March 19, 2020

Eagle Ford M&A

Steady Transaction Activity Restrained by Unforeseeable Circumstances

Over the last year, deal activity in the Eagle Ford Shale was relatively steady, picking up towards the end of 2019 and carrying into early 2020.  The recent uncertainty caused by the coronavirus pandemic and the Saudi-Russian oil production level conflict, however, has hindered M&A activity in the region, and frankly everywhere else.  WTI closed below $23/bbl on March 18 with futures prices indicating a depressed price environment persisting for the near term.  Although deal count has decreased as of late, the M&A landscape has the potential to ramp up as some companies will need to sell assets in order to bolster their balance sheets amid the challenging commodity price environment, though wide “bid/ask” spreads between buyers and sellers may be difficult to overcome.

Recent Transactions in the Eagle Ford

A table detailing E&P transaction activity in the Eagle Ford over the last twelve months is shown below.  Relative to 2018, deal count decreased by six transactions and the average deal size declined by roughly $650 million.

Ensign Natural Resources Entering, Pioneer Natural Resources Existing

Ensign Natural Resources made its first acquisition as a company in May of 2019, acquiring Eagle Ford acreage from Pioneer Natural Resources.  Brett Pennington, President and CEO of Ensign, explained that the assets included meaningful production and attractive drilling inventory.  Pioneer on the other hand, was ready to become a pure-play Permian operator.  In total, Pioneer has sold approximately $1 billion of assets located outside the Permian Basin.  Pioneer seemed to make it clear that they are throwing all of their eggs in one basket.

Callon Petroleum Expanding their Footprint

The biggest deal, in terms of dollars, was Callon Petroleum’s acquisition of Carrizo Oil & Gas.  Callon, a Permian Basin focused company, expanded its position in the Permian and entered the Eagle Ford with the acquired acreage.  The deal terms had to be revised after significant investor pushback.  The amended agreement stated that Callon shareholder would own approximately 58% (up from 54% initially) of the combined company and Carrizo shareholders will own approximately 42% (down from 46% initially).  It should be noted that this deal is not pure Eagle Ford shale.  Carrizo’s asset details included 76,500 acres in the Eagle Ford with roughly 600 undrilled locations and 46,000 acres in the Delaware Basin with about 1,400 undrilled locations.  The combined assets will include 120,000 net acres in the Permian and 80,000 net acres in the Eagle Ford.  The core positions in the Permian and Eagle Ford plan to produce over 100,000 boe/d of pro forma production.  Joe Gatto, president, and CEO of Callon, explained his vision of the larger company, which is to employ a more efficient scaled development model that aims to drive a lower cost of supply.  The multibillion-dollar merger officially closed in December of 2019, and now seems like unfortunate timing due to the current price environment.

Repsol S.A. Picking Up Where Equinor Left Off

Equinor, a Norway based petroleum refining company, agreed to sell its Eagle Ford assets to Repsol for $325 at the end of 2019.  The agreement gives Repsol, a Spain headquartered oil & gas company, 100% control of the asset while making them the operator.  In 2017, Equinor took an $850 million impairment on the asset due to lower than expected output.  In 2018, Equinor also released that part of their acreage lies on areas with high water stress variables.  Repsol expressed that the acquisition will give their producing assets portfolio a boost while taking advantage of operating synergies and efficiencies.  The acquisition is also aligned with Repsol’s intentions to expand in North America.  The deal plans to increase total production for Repsol in the Eagle Ford to approximately 54,000 boe/d.

Conclusion

M&A transaction activity in Eagle Ford was fairly consistent throughout 2019, as companies focused to acquire valuable acreage with production potential.  However, no one can ignore the tough current conditions in the energy industry.  Acquisitions that closed at the end of last year seem like the least of worries, as companies are simply trying to avoid bankruptcy.  If conditions allow only the strongest to survive, it could lead to an increase in transaction activity ahead.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas industry in North America and around the world.  In addition to our corporate valuation services, Mercer Capital provides investment banking and transaction advisory services to a broad range of public and private companies and financial institutions.  We have relevant experience working with companies in the oil and gas space and can leverage our historical valuation and investment banking experience to help you navigate a critical transaction, providing timely, accurate and reliable results.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.
Industry Spotlight: Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Industry Spotlight | Natural Gas Outlook: Producers Face A Familiar Disconnect In 2026
Earlier this month, I was in Western Oklahoma for a trial. Surrounded by the wide-open Great Plains and the unmistakable presence of oil and gas infrastructure, it was impossible not to think about the industry’s influence on the region. A few people asked me if I had watched the acclaimed show, Landman, and as I hadn't, I started the series on my flights home.

Cart

Your cart is empty