Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

October 24, 2017

Trends in the Refining Industry Display Cautious Optimism

A general theme across refiners' earnings calls and updates over the last few months was a story of cautious optimism. In this blog post, we outline prevalent general themes in the downstream oil market that have given refiners hope for 2018 as well as those that cause skepticism about the future.

Sweet & Sour Differential

The price differential between light, sweet crude and heavy, sour crude has been shrinking since the fall of oil prices in 2014.  From a max differential of $42.50 in December 2012, the differential has fallen to an average of $11 over the last month.

"OPEC cuts have impacted the available supply of medium and heavy sour grades resulting in narrow feedstock differentials which is a challenge to our complex refining system." – Thomas J. Nimbley, Chairman and CEO at PBF Energy on Second Quarter Earnings Call

The differential has been shrinking as the global supply of oil has remained high causing crude benchmark prices to converge.  Since the price of light, sweet U.S. crude has fallen, the cost savings that companies used to realize when purchasing heavy feedstock cannot make up for the higher costs of cracking it.

Retrofitting Refineries

As explained by Canada Oil Sands Magazine, "Refineries typically blend different grades of crude with varying quality specifications. Depending on the configuration of the refinery, each facility has a limited ability to handle heavy grades of crude and Sulphur."  U.S. refineries were traditionally retrofitted to handle heavy crude because it allowed for higher refining margins.  The U.S. traditionally has more complex refineries than Europe and Canada, which allows them to better crack heavy molecules into light, value-add products, such as jet fuel.

However, starting in mid-2014, US refiners began struggling to keep up with the amount of light sweet crude available for sale in the US markets since most refineries were not built to handle such light crude.  It was thought that the initial relaxation and eventual elimination of the crude oil export ban would relieve US refiners from this pressure.  But the over-supply of oil across the globe dampened this effect.

Because the price of light, sweet crude and heavy, sour crude has started to converge, there is potential for higher margins from light crude.  Even if refiners have to pay the upfront investment costs to retrofit their facilities to handle lighter crude, they can face lower operating expenses going forward as it is easier to refine light crude than heavy crude into higher margin products.

"We expect to see improved margin capture as we are now able to upgrade components of our gasoline pool into higher octane, low sulfur finished product." -Thomas J. Nimbley, Chairman and CEO at PBF Energy on Second Quarter Earnings Call

Widened Crack Spread

The crack spread is the price differential between crude oil and its refined oil products.  The 3-2-1 crack spread approximates refinery yield using the industry average for refinery production.  For every three barrels of crude oil the refinery processes, it makes two barrels of gasoline and one barrel of distillate fuel.

The crack spread is a good indication of refiners' profit margins.  As shown in the chart above, the WTI crack spread increased over the first half of the year giving the downstream markets optimism about the rest of the year to come.  The crack spread peaked at the end of August as many refiners were forced to shut down due to damage caused by Hurricane Harvey and the price of refined products spiked. The spread has since fallen to approximately $17 per barrel of WTI.
"The decrease to refining margin was primarily driven by the higher RINs cost, which were partially offset by the increase in the Group 3 2-1-1 crack spread." – Susan M. Ball, CFO & Treasure of CVR Refining GP LLC on CVRR’s Second Quarter Earnings Call

Higher RIN Costs

The Renewable Fuels Standards (RFS) Program has continued to have a significant impact on the refining sector over the last year.  The RFS were signed into law by President George W. Bush in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and boost rural farm economies.  Each November, the EPA issues rules increasing Renewable Fuel Volume Targets for the next year. RINs (Renewable Identification Numbers) are used to implement the Renewable Fuel Standards.  At the end of the year, producers and importers use RINs to demonstrate their compliance with the RFS.  Refiners and producers without blending capabilities can either purchase renewable fuels with RINs attached or they can purchase RINs through the EPA’s Moderated Transaction System. While large, integrated refiners have the capability to blend their petroleum products with renewable fuels, small- and medium-sized merchant refiners do not have this capability and are required to purchase RINS, which have significantly increased in price.

RIN expenses have remained high and although President Trump promised to help small- and medium-sized merchant refiners who were disadvantaged by RFS, he also spoke fondly of the RFS program during his campaign.

On July 5, 2017, the EPA issued proposed volume requirements under the Renewable Fuel Standard program, which are summarized below.

A public hearing was held on August 1, 2017, and on October 17, 2017, the EPA provided a public notice and an opportunity to comment on potential reductions in the 2018/ 2019 biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel volumes.  The final rule should be available in December.

Conclusion

Refiners were generally optimistic about their performance over the first six months of 2017. Higher crack spreads have allowed margins to increase and many believe that the Trump administration will help relieve some of the pressure caused by the RFS. Additionally, it is possible that the RFS volume requirements could be reduced further which would relieve margin pressure for merchant refiners.

The quote below from HollyFrontier’s second-quarter earnings call appropriately summarizes the current state of the industry.

"Our refining outlook for 2017 remains cautiously optimistic. We anticipate solid economic growth will continue to support refined product demand and sustained growth in domestic crude oil production will lead to improved crude differentials. We are also optimistic that a more favorable regulatory environment could provide a tailwind for both the refining industry and the economy as a whole. With a large portion of our scheduled maintenance behind us, we are poised for strong financial and operational performance for the remainder of the year." – George J. Damiris, CEO, President, & Director at HollyFrontier – on Second Quarter Earnings Call

Mercer Capital has significant experience valuing assets and companies in the energy industry, throughout the upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors.  Our oil and gas valuations have been reviewed and relied on by buyers and sellers and Big 4 Auditors. These oil and gas related valuations have been utilized to support valuations for IRS Estate and Gift Tax, GAAP accounting, and litigation purposes. We have performed oil and gas valuations and associated oil and gas reserves domestically throughout the United States and in foreign countries. Contact a Mercer Capital professional today to discuss your valuation needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty