Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
shutterstock_2364977019.jpg

May 8, 2017

Why Aren’t We Talking About the Gulf of Mexico?

Artem Abramov, of Rystad Energy, recently published an article in the Oil and Gas Financial Journal comparing shale and offshore drilling.  He claims, the “Gulf of Mexico [is] as important as [the] Permian Basin for U.S. oil production” but it has been overlooked since the advancement of shale gas.  The EIA reports that offshore drilling accounts for 17% of total domestic crude oil production. So, why aren’t we talking more about oil and gas production from the Gulf of Mexico (GoM)?

Unlike shale plays, where production varies with oil prices, production in the Gulf of Mexico has been resilient to fluctuations in prices because projects in the Gulf of Mexico have longer time horizons.   After the downturn in oil prices drilling activity remained relatively flat at 25-35 wellbores per quarter.  The relative price insensitivity over the short term meant that the Gulf of Mexico did not see substantial production drops like many other oil producing regions of the U.S. when prices fell in mid-2014.  However, this also means that as oil prices have recently increased, the Gulf has not seen substantial increases in production.

The Oil and Gas Financial Journal article stated:

Only two sources of oil supply in the U.S. remained exceptionally resilient throughout the downturn: The Permian Basin and the Gulf of Mexico.  The Permian Basin’s output was growing every quarter, adding 300 Mbbl/d from the first quarter of 2015 through the fourth quarter of 2016.  While exposed to seasonal disruptions, GoM’s production was able to deliver a 240 Mbbl/d growth over the same period, contributing almost equally with the Permian Basin to the limited decline pace of the total U.S. oil production.

Right before the 2014 downturn in oil prices, many deepwater drilling projects were approved. This led to increased start-up activity in the Gulf in the second half of 2016 which increased crude and condensate production by 400 Mbbl/d from 2014 to 2016.  In 2016, eight projects came online in the GoM and another seven projects are expected to come online by the end of 2018.  In 2016, crude oil production in the Gulf of Mexico reached an annual high of 1.6 Mmbbl/d which surpassed the previous high which was set in 2009.  Oil production is expected to reach 1.7 Mmbbl/d in 2017 and 1.8 Mmbbl/d in 2018 in the Gulf of Mexico.

Recently, most oil and gas news has been centered on the Permian Basin.  As we explained in a recent post, the Permian Basin has had recent success due to its locational advantage, vast amount of untapped reserves, and low breakeven prices.   Most of the major M&A deals in the upstream sector were in the Permian Basin in 2016.  According to James Scarlett of RS Energy Group, approximately 25% of the U.S.’ lower 48 production came from the Permian Basin and 38% of the rigs in the U.S. are in the Permian.  The reason for so much concentration is that about 80% of currently economic (economic meaning under $50 breakeven oil) oil is in the Permian, particularly the Delaware Basin. Secondly, due to the numerous potential production zones (Wolfcamp, Bone Spring, Leonard Shale, Delaware Sands, etc.), there is a huge amount of oil in place for potential recovery (3,000 feet of pay zones).  Couple this with an area (West Texas) that has ample existing infrastructure from decades of development, and this has led to what some people are calling a land grab in the area.

The Gulf of Mexico’s success can be similarly explained.  The EAI reports that 45% of total petroleum refining capital and 51% of U.S. natural gas processing plant capacity is located along the Gulf Coast, giving the Gulf easy access to its downstream market. Additionally, much of the midstream infrastructure is already in place, which allows companies to save money by utilizing already developed pipelines.  Further, the Gulf of Mexico had 4.8 billion barrels of crude oil proved reserves at year end 2015, according to the most recent information published by the EIA. In comparison, RRC Districts 7C, 8, and 8A, which includes the majority of the Permian Basin, combined proved reserves at year end 2015 of 7.3 billion barrels, and North Dakota, home to the Bakken shale play, had 5.2 billion barrels of proved reserves (2015 reserve estimates do not include some recent significant discoveries, including the discovery of an estimated 20 billion barrels in the Wolfcamp shale play in the Permian Basin).  In addition, the Gulf of Mexico has been able to realize increased drilling efficiency for many years.  Average drilling speed in shale increased by 100% from 2011 to 2016, but the Gulf of Mexico was not far behind, averaging an increase in drilling speeds by 60-75% from 2015 to 2016.  As shown in the chart below sourced from the Oil and Gas Financial Journal, drilling efficiency improvement in the GoM is greater than in shale oil.

avg-well-curves-shale-oil While the energy sector as a whole is expected to benefit from President Trump’s pro-energy policy, offshore drilling has recently been at the center of political talks. Interior Department Secretary Ryan Zinke signed two secretarial orders last week which are expected to increase America’s offshore energy potential. The first order, directed by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), is to develop a new five-year plan for offshore oil and gas exploration and to reconsider the regulations surrounding these activities.  Secretary Zinke said that regulations which were created with good intentions, but that have been harmful to America’s energy industry, will be reviewed.  While some regulations have been removed, such as the Offshore Air Quality Control, Reporting, and Compliance Rule, Offshore Petroleum Industry Training Organization (OPITO) officials are encouraging the U.S. to follow their common industry standards, which have been adopted by 45 other oil producing regions internationally. The second order established a new position to coordinate the Interior Departments energy portfolio.  Zinke noted that in 2008 federal leasing revenue for the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) was approximately $18 billion, but it was only $2.8 billion in 2016.  Focused on increasing leasing revenue, President Trump is likely to experience some legal obstacles.  In 2006, Congress placed a moratorium on drilling within 125 miles of the Florida Coast until 2022. However, this area is estimated to contain up to 2.35 billion barrels of oil.  President Obama in November 2016 permitted 10 lease sales in areas of the Gulf of Mexico in moratorium, but this plan only covered a small portion of the eastern gulf coast.  President Trump wants to expand leasing rights but will likely have to battle much of this argument in court because it requires a public comment period.1 One impact of the recent downturn in oil prices was the need for shorter term capital projects.  As we talked about in a recent post, "The Wild Goose Chase Is Over", companies have been looking to invest in quick ventures that have short payback periods.  The Gulf of Mexico is known to have longer payback periods but has been working to shorten investment time horizons.  Companies are focusing on “Subsea completions and tiebacks where you already have the infrastructure – the platform in place, the pipeline to the market place – so those require significantly less capital and faster lead times than the big spars that people think of in offshore projects” as Deloitte’s Andrew Slaughter said in a recent interview with the Oil and Gas Financial Journal.2 While the Permian Basin has been the center of most oil and gas discussion recently, there are notable investments being made in other oil rich areas of the U.S.  In February, Shell invested in the Kaikias oil and gas project in the Gulf of Mexico.  It will start production in 2019 and will be able to generate profits even with oil prices lower than $40 /bbl.  Last December BP made a similar announcement of a $9 billion investment, called “Mad Dog Phase 2” in the Gulf of Mexico that is expected to be profitable at $40/ bbl oil.  With uncertainty surrounding the future price of oil due to the unpredictability of OPEC’s production cuts, it is important for oil and gas producers to find economically efficient plays. While the Permian is currently one of the most economical plays, we cannot rule out all others such as those in the Gulf of Mexico.  Although the market is not rallying around the Gulf of Mexico like it is around the Permian, we can expect continued growth in the region over the next few years. Mercer Capital has significant experience valuing assets and companies in the energy and construction industries.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional today to discuss your valuation needs in confidence.

End Notes

1 Dlouhy, Jennifer. “Trump to Expand Offshore Drilling, Review Deepwater Horizon Regs. Bloomberg News. 2 Tiebacks are subsea lines that connect new wells to existing projects.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty