Transaction Advisory, Oil & Gas

August 7, 2018

A Review of M&A Activity in the Downstream Oil & Gas Space

Nesting Dolls of Refinery Acquisitions

On April 30, 2018, Marathon Petroleum announced its acquisition of the newly formed Andeavor making Marathon the largest refiner in the U.S. (by capacity) and one of the top five refiners in the world.  The merger is moving into its final stages, and Marathon’s CEO is positive about the combination of the two well situated companies.

In this post, we analyze the recent acquisition history of Western Refining, Tesoro, and Marathon, which has started to look somewhat like nesting dolls of acquisitions.

For an industry that has had sluggish M&A activity in the last couple years, this line of acquisitions seems to hint to a possible trend of consolidation.  Domestic oil production has increased significantly over the last couple years.  Even though export bans on crude oil were lifted a couple years ago, overall, there is more crude oil in the U.S. that needs to be refined.  According to the EIA, U.S. refining capacity is “virtually unchanged from 2017 to 2018.”  Domestic refineries are now running at average utilization figures of 90%, as compared to the IEA’s global average of 70%.  Building a new refinery takes time and money and has significant regulatory hurdles; thus U.S. refiners appear to be combining in order to increase efficiencies and meet the higher demand for their services as a result of the recent increase in domestic crude oil production.

Recent Acquisition History

The table below shows metrics from the line of acquisitions leading up to Marathon’s acquisition of Andeavor, along with other recent transactions in the downstream space for comparison.

Western Refining’s Acquisition of Northern Tier for $1.6 Billion

In late 2015, Western Refining bought all remaining shares of Northern Tier Refining, not already owned by Western Refining and its subsidiaries, for $1.6 billon. (Western Refining previously bought a controlling interest in Northern Tier for $775 million in 2013.) The resulting company had three refineries in Gallup, NM; St Paul, MN; and El Paso, TX.

Western Refining paid 5.3x EBITDA for the remaining minority position in Northern Tier.  Some analysts such as Albert Alfonso, originally believed that the deal was undervalued.  While the deal multiples were quite a bit lower than the multiples observed in the downstream space at the time, it is important to consider the premiums paid for acquisitions of control versus the price paid in this acquisition of a minority position by a company that previously paid for control.  For comparison purposes, this transaction is more similar to Delek’s 2017 acquisition of the remaining shares of Alon at 5.9x EBITDA for a minority stake.

Tesoro’s Acquisition of Western Refining for $6.4 Billion

In November 2016, Western Refining and Tesoro Corporation merged to form Andeavor. Tesoro bought Western Refining for 10.6x EBITDA and 80% of revenues, which at the time was in line with the earnings multiples observed in Delek’s acquisition of shares of Alon U.S. Energy for 11.0x EBITDA. (Through this transaction, Delek gained control of the entity of which they originally owned 48%.)  The newly formed Andeavor was the fourth largest independent refiner in the U.S.

Tesoro had refineries in California, Washington, Alaska, Utah, and North Dakota. The addition of Western Frontier expanded their presence by adding refining locations in Texas, New Mexico, and Minnesota.

Western Refining shareholders received either 0.4350 Tesoro shares, or $37.30 in cash per share. As compared to the previous day’s closing price of Western Refining, the shareholders received a 22.3% premium, according to a Fortune article about the transaction.  In order to prevent dilution from the offering of additional shares, Tesoro announced it would increase its buyback program by $1 billion.  The deal was expected to create between $350 and $425 million in synergies to be realized in the first two years of their combination.

In addition to expanded refining capacity, the combined companies had over 3,000 retail stations.

Marathon’s Acquisition of Andeavor for $23.3 Billion (Enterprise Value of $35.6 Billion)

Marathon Petroleum is expected to close on its acquisition, newly formed Andeavor for 12.7x EBITDA, which shows a slight premium to the few transactions observed in the refining space lately.  Andeavor shareholders will have the option to choose 1.87 shares of MPC stock, or $152.27 in cash per share. This represents a 25% premium to the closing price the day before the transaction was announced.   In order to prevent dilution from the issuance of additional MPC shares, Marathon’s Board approved $5 billion repurchase authorization.

The two companies were largely located in different parts of the country as shown in the map below. Andeavor Chairman and CEO Greg Goff (who will become Executive Vice Chairman at MPC) explained,

“Look at the map of the two companies and the way they are positioned geographically in the United States and you come to the conclusion that this is a great opportunity to be able to bring the companies together.”

The map below shows the locations of both Marathon and Andeavor’s refineries.

Marathon had six refineries in the eastern half of the U.S. and Andeavor had 10 refineries in the western U.S. and AlaskaThe combined company will have approximately 15% of total fuel making ability in the U.S. Additionally, the combined companies have over 7,800 branded fuel stations.

Immediately Accretive Deal

Accretive deals add more value than they cost, either over time or immediately.  The Marathon and Andeavor deal is expected to be immediately accretive to earnings per share; meaning the price paid by Marathon is lower than the immediate expected boost in earnings per share post-acquisition.

The deal is expected to create significant synergies resulting in around $1 billion over the first three years.  These synergies will come as a result of stronger purchasing power, system optimizations, procurement efficiencies, leveraging of assets, and retail network efficiencies. Additionally, according to Marathon’s Chairman and CEO, Gary Heminger, thinks that the potential synergies could be even greater than the estimated $1 billion.  However, that remains to be seen.  Many analysts are sometimes skeptical of synergies due to their somewhat abstract nature.

Did Marathon Pay Too Much?

Marathon’s acquisition of Andeavor comes at a time when U.S. refineries are positioned to benefit from the increase in domestic production of oil and gas. Many refineries that purchase WTI crude are currently benefitting from the discount of WTI to Brent, which has lowered their costs of sales as refined product prices are still increasing.  Refineries margins have increased 8% worldwide and almost 25% in the U.S. Midwest year over year according to British Petroleum’s Refiner Marker Margins and crack spreads have increased as shown in the graph below.

Management of both companies seem positive regarding the deal and there seems to be little reason to believe that the deal would face any resistance from regulators as there was is little overlap in the locations of the refiners.  However, investors of MPC could ask if MPC paid too much? Stock buybacks are generally a signal to investors that the Company views its own stock as a good investment.  Additionally, management will generally not buy back shares if they think the stock is currently overpriced.  Marathon’s announcement of a buyback should somewhat ease investors’ concerns.

Conclusion

It is hard to pinpoint the root cause of the recent consolidation activity in the downstream oil and gas space. The pressure of RIN expenses on smaller refineries that do not have the capacity to blend their renewable fuels could be one cause of consolidation.  The immediate need for more operating capacity as U.S. oil production has increased might be pressuring larger refiners to purchase rather than build additional capacity. Additionally, the recent tumult of the global trade environment adds an additional layer of uncertainty for U.S. refineries whose main export market is Mexico.

In addition to our corporate valuation services, Mercer Capital provides investment banking and transaction advisory services to a broad range of public and private companies and financial institutions.  We have relevant experience working with companies in the oil and gas space and can leverage our historical valuation and investment banking experience to help you navigate a critical transaction, providing timely, accurate and reliable results.

Whether you are selling your business, acquiring another business or division, or have needs related to mergers, valuations, fairness opinions, and other transaction advisory needs, we can help.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty