Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
shutterstock_2364977019.jpg

August 14, 2018

Public Royalty Trusts (Part II)

Can Revenue Interests Still Benefit from Capital Appreciation?

In a recent post, we explored the ins and outs of MV Oil Trust.  We analyzed the underlying net profit interests it holds, the underlying properties of the trust, and the rights of unitholders including their rights during termination of the trust.  This week, we will look into how these play into the composition of the MV Oil Trust’s stock price, and the balance struck between investor’s current return in the form of dividends and potential for returns from capital appreciation.

Tradeoff Between Current and Future Returns

There is a natural friction between distributions of earnings versus reinvestment for growth.  Young and growing companies tend to reinvest their earnings to fund future growth opportunities.  Investors in such companies, therefore, have to be willing to forego upfront returns in hope of realizing greater returns down the road.  Investors in mature companies, however, generally expect to receive dividends as a return on their investment because these companies typically have fewer opportunities for growth.

Composition of Stock Price

While public royalty trusts are equity securities by name, they have unique characteristics that differentiate them from many equity securities.  Investors typically take on exposure to equity securities for two basic reasons: receipt of cash dividends and anticipation of capital appreciation.  Cash dividends are residual earnings of the Company paid to the investor at the discretion of management, and these are current returns.  Capital appreciation occurs through the sale of shares at a price higher than what the investor paid, and this is a future return.

Investors in public royalty trusts are typically seeking dividends. Because the investment is ultimately in a depleting asset (oil or gas reserves), capital (and therefore stock price) is expected to depreciate to zero in the long run.  Many public royalty trusts, including MV Oil Trust, are restricted from acquiring more assets or interests, and most earnings are required to be paid out.  These restrictions are similar to another type of trust: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).  Because most earnings must be distributed, dividends paid to investors would not appear to be constrained by the discretion of management, and therefore some investors consider investments in trusts to be less risky.  This is not necessarily the case for royalty trusts, however, because the source of income is less stable and the ultimate level of cash distributions is dependent on the level of production set by the operator (who is not always associated with the management of the trust).  Thus, investments in royalty trusts may be viewed to be riskier than investments in REITs due to this unique control structure.

Let’s Get Theoretical

According to the dividend discount model, the intrinsic value of a stock is the expected value of future dividends, discounted back to the present at an appropriate discount rate. Forecasts of dividends are typically estimated for anywhere between 3-15 years, or until a time where future dividends will grow/decline at a stable rate.  At this point, a terminal value is added, which accounts for all remaining value after earnings have stabilized, which is discounted back to the present.

In the case of public royalty trusts, units of the trusts tend to hold declining intrinsic value.  That is, their intrinsic value will drop to zero upon expiration of the trust agreement.  This would imply no terminal value, save for the potential liquidation of assets.  In the case of MV Oil, the trust will distribute the net proceeds from the sale of assets upon dissolution of the trust, so there will be a terminal value that accounts for future production remaining from the underlying properties. When a dividend is paid, the market value of the trust should decrease by the amount of the dividend.  As an example, imagine a public royalty trust paying quarterly distributions of about 50¢ per share for the next two years prior to termination with a terminal value of zero.  If the stock price is a little under $4.00, after accounting for the present value of these distributions, the stock price should decline by 50¢ upon receipt of the first dividend, because the stock at that point will only be worth the remaining seven distributions.

Capital Expenditures Constraints

MV Oil Trust is restricted from acquiring other properties or interests, but it will still spend money on drilling new wells on their established sites, as well as covering maintenance of currently producing wells.  These maintenance expenditures may affect the quantity of proved reserves that can be economically produced.  Because MV Partners has agreed to limit the amount of capital expenditures in a given year, they may choose to delay certain capital projects into the next year when the budget allows.  If operators do not implement required maintenance projects when warranted, the future rate of production decline of proved reserves may be higher than the rate currently expected.  So, the capital expenditure limit, implemented as a protection for unitholders, could actually have a deleterious effect.

Is There Any Room for Capital Appreciation?

The question then becomes, can revenue interests in an oil and gas royalty experience capital appreciation? With the requirement to pay out substantially all of its earnings as distributions and restriction on acquiring new properties or interests, it would appear that capital appreciation is unlikely.  However, as we have seen in the public market, commodity price expectations can vary and change significantly in a relatively short time period. In the case of MV Oil Trust, the rebound in commodity prices and subsequent return to distributions caused the significant increase in unit price over the past two years.  Even though investors are purchasing the right to obtain future distributions, buying low and selling high on the units is possible, as with any investment.  For public royalty trusts, investors would need to be able to anticipate shifts in either production or price.

Drill Baby Drill?

Capital appreciation for royalties is not limited to the potential upside from increasing crude and natural gas prices.  MV Oil Trust has drilled new wells in each of the past three years, providing investors with an upside not seen in all royalty trusts.  Additional wells increase capacity which will increase royalty revenue and therefore increase future dividends, thus raising the value of the trust.  Proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) present an upside to unitholders, and drilling wells is the next step in developing these reserves, so they can eventually be produced and sold.

Many royalty trusts either have not recently drilled any new wells or they do not have any proved reserves that are left undeveloped.  This includes Permian Basin Royalty Trust, Mesa Royalty Trust, Sabine Royalty Trust, VOC Energy Trust, San Juan Basin Royalty Trust, and Pacific Oil Trust.

Some trusts originally had upside from wells that they were contractually obligated to drill in an “Area of Mutual Interest (AMI)” when the trust was started.  This includes the three SandRidge trusts, which we discussed in a recent post.  Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust and ECA Marcellus Trust I also agreed to drill wells in an AMI, neither have drilled any further wells after fulfilling this requirement.  Thus investors in these trusts will likely only realize capital appreciation if crude prices unexpectedly increase and stabilize at this higher price.

Hugoton Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust have had little to no drilling in recent years, but both benefit from having XTO Energy as an operator, who has indicated plans to drill new wells that will benefit each of these trusts.

Enduro Royalty Trust, MV Oil Trust, BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust, and Whiting USA Trust II have all had drilling in recent years.  MV Oil Trust’s undeveloped reserves represent 14% of proved reserves, representing potential upside from future drilling.  Prudhoe Bay has drilled over 100 wells in the past three years, and it has experienced the third highest 2-year return.  Whiting USA Trust II has significant undeveloped acreage in the Permian, which likely plays a role in its superior 2-year return for investors.

The remaining four mineral partnerships are either C Corporations or MLPs. As discussed recently, they are designed to gather assets and grow through acquisitions.  Because they are not structured as trusts, they are not required to distribute a substantial amount of their earnings.

Conclusion

Even when royalty trusts are prohibited from acquiring more assets, investors can realize capital appreciation if oil price expectations change, the operator of the underlying assets drill more wells and/ or increase their operating efficiency, or if management expedites distributions.

While the value of the underlying asset of royalty trusts (royalty interests) are expected to decline over time, there is still an opportunity for capital appreciation with commodity price changes or additional drilling.  Ultimately, declining revenue distributions for private owners of royalty interests typically do not benefit from capital appreciation, but selling at the opportune time can effectively function as capital appreciation.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation and cash flow questions regarding royalty interests.  Contact Mercer Capital to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty