Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
shutterstock_116426230.jpg

October 9, 2019

Bakken May Lack Flash, But Has Fundamentals

The economics of oil and gas production vary by region. Mercer Capital focuses on trends in the Eagle Ford, Permian, Bakken, and Appalachia plays. The cost of producing oil and gas depends on the geological makeup of the reserve, depth of reserve, and cost to transport the raw crude to market. We can observe different costs in different regions depending on these factors. In this post, we take a closer look at the Bakken Shale.

Production and Activity Levels

Bakken production grew approximately 10% year-over-year through September.  While this growth rate lags behind the Permian, it is in line with production growth in Appalachia and meaningfully bests the Eagle Ford.

The rig count in the Bakken at the end of September was unchanged from the year prior at 53.  While not impressive at first glance, the total U.S. rig count declined nearly 20% over the same period.  Eagle Ford, Permian, and Appalachia rig counts declined 22%, 15%, and 17%, respectively. The Bakken has also seen the biggest gain in new-well production per rig relative to our other coverage basins.  While this metric doesn’t cover the full life cycle of a well, it is a signal of the increasing efficiency of operators in the area.  New well production per rig in the Bakken increased 29% on a year-over-year basis through September, compared to increases of 2%, 12%, and 7% in the Eagle Ford, Permian, and Appalachia, respectively.

Financial Performance

Bakken E&P operator financial performance was a mixed bag over the past year.  Canada’s Crescent Point Energy (CPG) was the only positive performer of the Bakken-focused operators, up 23% year-over-year through September.   While down 16%, Hess outperformed the broader S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (XOP).  However, this was likely attributable (at least in part) to positive developments out of Guyana, where Hess has a 30% interest in the massive Stabroek block.  The Stabroek block is one of the largest offshore oil discoveries in the past decade, with more than 6 billion boe of discovered, recoverable resource.

Continental, Whiting, and Oasis all unperformed the broader E&P index during the past year, with Whiting down a notable 85%.  Oasis is funding its Permian development program with cash flows generated from its Bakken position, a strategy that has fallen out of favor with investors who now seek capital discipline and free cash flow generation.  Whiting is down largely on concerns regarding leverage and inventory life.  All three saw margin compression, with Whiting’s EBITDAX per boe down nearly 30% year-over-year. Despite this financial performance, the Bakken hasn’t been impacted by the recent batch of bankruptcies that have afflicted the Mid-Con (Alta Mesa, White Star), Eagle Ford (Sanchez, EP Energy), and even the Permian (Halcon).  However, Whiting did announce a major restructuring in which it will terminate 254 positions (around one-third of the company’s workforce).  As a result, the company anticipates approximately $50 million in annual savings.

Commodity Prices Largely Unchanged in Aftermath of Saudi Attack

On September 14, a missile attack on Saudi Arabian oil production facilities took out 5.7 million barrels a day of production, amounting to about 5% of global production.  Both WTI and Brent crude prices surged more than 10% in the immediate aftermath of the attack.

However, the price reaction was short-lived, as the Saudis were able to bring 2 million bbl/d of production back online within days, with the remainder expected to be back online within weeks.  WTI and Brent prices ended September lower than on the day prior to the attack. Realized pricing in the Bakken has improved markedly relative to last fall, when a combination of Midwest refinery turnarounds and a glut of Canadian production sent the Clearbrook Bakken / WTI differential to more than $20/bbl.  At the end of September, the differential stood at approximately $2.50/bbl.  While thinly traded, basis futures indicate expected differentials of $2.50 to $4.30/bbl over the next several years.

Infrastructure Issues

The Dakota Access Pipeline largely alleviated crude takeaway constraints out of the basin.  And with a proposed expansion of the pipeline, the announced Liberty Pipeline, and excess crude-by-rail capacity, E&P operators likely won’t have issues getting crude to end markets.

However, both Whiting and Oasis indicated that issues with natural gas processing infrastructure adversely impacted performance during the quarter.

In the Q2 earnings call, Whiting CEO Brad Holly stated,

To minimize flaring, we are producing some wells at constrained oil rates, while we focus on increasing gas capture through the installation of mobile combustion units, building out gathering systems, and completing our ray gas processing plant. Constraints also impacted the pace of planned operating activity.

Oasis CEO Tommy Nusz put a finer point on his commentary, specifically stating that downtime at the company’s Wild Basin gas complex reduced 2Q19 production by 3,000 boe/d.

These constraints should moderate, though, as additional natural gas infrastructure comes online in late 2019 and early 2020.

MLP Simplification Trend Continues

The recent trend of MLP simplifications, driven in part by tax reform, FERC policy changes, cost of capital considerations, and a desire to reach a broader investor base, continues.  Hess Midstream Partners (HESM) announced that it is acquiring Hess Infrastructure Partners (HIP) in a $6.2 billion transaction.  HIP owns HESM’s General Partner (GP) units and Incentive Distribution Rights (IDRs), as well as an 80% interest in HESM’s oil and gas midstream assets.  Unlike most simplifications that have occurred once GP/IDR distributions are “high in the splits” (with the GP/IDR holder typically taking 50% of incremental distributions above a certain threshold), HESM was only at the 25% split level.

Fellow Bakken midstream operator Oasis Midstream Partners remains on a rapidly shortening list of MLPs that still have IDRs.

Conclusion

Now that the Bakken’s crude infrastructure issues have been (somewhat) resolved, the basin has seemed to take a backseat to other areas in terms of news coverage and investor attention.  While the Bakken hasn’t kept up with the Permian’s growth, its static (rather than declining) rig count, higher oil to gas ratio, and sufficient crude takeaway capacity bode well for the basin relative to its domestic counterparts.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space in both conventional and unconventional plays in North America, and around the world.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty