Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

April 8, 2019

Considerations for Endowments Divesting Fossil Fuels

Due to the historical popularity of this post, we revisit it this week. Originally published in 2018, the purpose of this post is to educate and advise those who have decided to divest their fossil fuel assets and are unsure of how to proceed.
The American Council on Education reported in 2014 that college and university endowments are heavily invested in commodities, natural resources, private equity, and other illiquid assets.  In the 1990s, endowments invested over 95% of their assets in traditional stocks and bonds. By 2013, less than 50% of endowment assets were invested in traditional equities. Currently, endowments have approximately 5% of their assets, $22 billion, invested in energy and natural resources. Over the last few years, many university students and church congregations have urged their trustees to consider divesting their endowments from fossil fuels. The Guardian in January 2018 explained “The divestment movement, primarily consisting of climate activists, is urging private and public institutions to rid their portfolios of all oil, gas, and coal stocks to send a financial and ethical message that fossil fuels are harmful and shouldn't be tolerated. So far, it's estimated that funds totaling $6 trillion have committed to divesting from fossil fuels.” Due to the favorable tax benefits of gifting assets to endowments upon death, your endowment may hold illiquid fossil fuel assets, such as mineral and royalty rights.  You have received an annuity-like stream of payments every month but are now considering divesting.  However, the shortage of a well-organized market for illiquid fossil fuel assets can cause a dilemma for trustees of endowments.  How do you sell your royalty and mineral rights and what are they worth? The purpose of an endowment is to provide a permanent source of funding that maintains the operations of colleges, universities, churches, etc.  To best serve its fiduciaries, an endowment should achieve the highest return possible.  Congruently, when divesting, the endowment must ensure it achieved a fair price for its investments. This post does not weigh in on the discussion of whether endowments should or should not liquidate fossil fuels.  Rather, we hope to educate and advise those who have decided to divest their fossil fuel assets and are unsure of how to proceed.

The Growth of Illiquid Assets

The growth of illiquid assets in endowments investment portfolios is not a surprising trend.   While illiquid assets garner more downside risk, they also offer the potential for higher returns than those realized in the traditional equity marketplace.  A proper fiduciary who weighs the risks and reward of illiquid assets over time will likely like include these assets in their portfolios. However, when it comes time to liquidate these assets, a trustee must act carefully. Selling illiquid assets requires a thorough understanding, and as trustee, it is your fiduciary duty to understand these transactions or seek the advice of someone who does.

Divesting publicly traded fossil fuel stocks and bonds is relatively simple.  While it can be beneficial to consider the timing of your sale with movements in the market, generally you can contact your portfolio manager or log onto your trading account directly and liquidate these stocks or ETFs within minutes.

Unlike public equity investments, mineral interests and royalty rights investments cannot be liquidated at known market prices instantaneously.  Rather, the price and the terms of the deal must be agreed to by both the buyer and the seller.

What Are Your Mineral and Royalty Rights Worth?

One of the most common methods used to value mineral and royalty rights is a discounted cash flow analysis.  The holders of royalty rights receive a monthly payment similar to that of a bond holder or commercial real estate lessor.  Thus, future payments can be predicted and then discounted back to the present.  However, the payments to a royalty holder can drastically increase or cease entirely without the say of the royalty holder.  This makes the prediction of future cash flows used to value the asset much more difficult.  Future cash flows must consider the current and future oil price environment, future levels of production, decline curves, the financial strength of current operators, and many other factors.  As we explain in our whitepaper, How to Value an Oil and Gas Royalty Interest,

To perform a royalty’s DCF analysis, production levels must be projected over the well’s useful life. Given that well production decreases at a decreasing rate, these projections can be calculated through deriving a decline rate from historical production. Revenue is a function of both production and price; as such, after developing a legitimate prediction of production volumes, analysts must predict future price.  The stream of income (revenue less taxes and deductions) is then discounted back to present value using a discount rate that accounts for risk in the industry.”

The guideline transaction approach can also provide a helpful indication of value. To develop an indication of mineral royalty interest value using the market approach, you can utilize data from market transactions of mineral interests in similar plays. Acquisition data can be utilized to calculate valuation multiples that take into account industry factors (or at least the market participants’ perception of these factors) far more directly than the asset-based approach or income-based approach.  In many ways, this approach goes straight to the heart of value: mineral interests and royalty rights are worth what someone is willing to pay for them.

Offer Letters

Adding to the uncertainty surrounding the value of royalty rights, the majority of mineral interest and royalty right owners with whom we work receive a couple, if not dozens, of offer letters every year. While offer letters, like transactions, do provide an indication of what someone is willing to pay for the asset, the definition of fair market value includes both a willing buyer and a willing seller.  Since these offers are only half of the equation, they should not be used in isolation as an indication of value.  As shown in the excerpt from the offer letter below, the distinction between fair market value and offer prices is critical in order to protect yourself from brokers attempting to profit at your expense.

Offer letters generally offer a multiple of average monthly cash flow on your revenue checks.  These multiples can range widely, often from less than 60x to more than 200x monthly cash flow.  Unfortunately, there is not one benchmark that can be applied to monthly cash flows across the nation, or even within one basin, so there is not an easy way to determine if you are receiving a fair price.

Especially after the fall in oil prices in mid-2014, we saw many offers that used scare tactics to try to persuade royalty owners to sell their interests at absurdly low prices.  Since the crash in oil prices, many royalty owners stopped receiving royalty checks; however, this does not mean their royalty interests are worthless.  Even now that oil prices have recovered and production is at an all-time high, some offer letters seek to take advantage of inexperienced royalty owners by suggesting that recent acquisitions, drilling activity, or changes in production have increased the risk, and therefore, decreased the value of their investment.  An understanding of royalty and mineral prices is not common to the average and even advanced investor and information about royalty and mineral rights is scare and difficult to find.  This, unfortunately, means that these scare tactics often work.

A recent offer letter to one of our clients read,

“As you may know, Hess Corporation has sold their interest in this unit. But there is another risk factor, as well. While it's hard to see on your revenue checks, from 2015 to 2016 the production declined by 10.1%. The decline over the past 30 years has been 1.7%. While the decline has improved this year, it makes one wonder what the decline will be in the future. As a mineral owner in this unit, it certainly has my attention. I'm making this aggressive offer in the belief it will go back to historical declines.”

This offer of 90x monthly cash flow was received in August, following the announcement of the acquisition.  By October when the details of the acquisition had been further explained to the investor community, our client had received another offer for approximately 140x monthly cash flow.

While there are legitimate online brokers who will buy your royalty interest for a fair price, the best solution is to know and understand the value of your asset before you start searching for a credible buyer.

The Value of Mineral Interests and Royalty Rights

As explained in our post "Before Selling Your Oil and Gas Royalty Interest Read This," we believe there are three points you need to understand before selling your mineral interest and royalty rights.

  1. Understand what you are selling
  2. Recognize production and price as value drivers
  3. Understand the location’s impact
The responsibility of divesting fossil fuels assets, especially for churches, often falls to a volunteer board that is tasked with much more than overseeing the divestiture of their fossil fuel portfolio.  It is the board’s fiduciary duty to ensure that the endowment is operating in the best interest of its beneficiaries which means, they need to ensure they receive a fair price for their assets. At Mercer Capital we have valued mineral and royalty rights in located across the country.  We understand how the location of your assets affects value and work to monitor transactions in each region to understand the state of the current market.   Contact a Mercer Capital professional today to discuss your valuation and transaction advisory needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty