Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
4819-energy-cover-image-3.jpg

April 8, 2019

Considerations for Endowments Divesting Fossil Fuels

Due to the historical popularity of this post, we revisit it this week. Originally published in 2018, the purpose of this post is to educate and advise those who have decided to divest their fossil fuel assets and are unsure of how to proceed.
The American Council on Education reported in 2014 that college and university endowments are heavily invested in commodities, natural resources, private equity, and other illiquid assets.  In the 1990s, endowments invested over 95% of their assets in traditional stocks and bonds. By 2013, less than 50% of endowment assets were invested in traditional equities. Currently, endowments have approximately 5% of their assets, $22 billion, invested in energy and natural resources. Over the last few years, many university students and church congregations have urged their trustees to consider divesting their endowments from fossil fuels. The Guardian in January 2018 explained “The divestment movement, primarily consisting of climate activists, is urging private and public institutions to rid their portfolios of all oil, gas, and coal stocks to send a financial and ethical message that fossil fuels are harmful and shouldn't be tolerated. So far, it's estimated that funds totaling $6 trillion have committed to divesting from fossil fuels.” Due to the favorable tax benefits of gifting assets to endowments upon death, your endowment may hold illiquid fossil fuel assets, such as mineral and royalty rights.  You have received an annuity-like stream of payments every month but are now considering divesting.  However, the shortage of a well-organized market for illiquid fossil fuel assets can cause a dilemma for trustees of endowments.  How do you sell your royalty and mineral rights and what are they worth? The purpose of an endowment is to provide a permanent source of funding that maintains the operations of colleges, universities, churches, etc.  To best serve its fiduciaries, an endowment should achieve the highest return possible.  Congruently, when divesting, the endowment must ensure it achieved a fair price for its investments. This post does not weigh in on the discussion of whether endowments should or should not liquidate fossil fuels.  Rather, we hope to educate and advise those who have decided to divest their fossil fuel assets and are unsure of how to proceed.

The Growth of Illiquid Assets

The growth of illiquid assets in endowments investment portfolios is not a surprising trend.   While illiquid assets garner more downside risk, they also offer the potential for higher returns than those realized in the traditional equity marketplace.  A proper fiduciary who weighs the risks and reward of illiquid assets over time will likely like include these assets in their portfolios. However, when it comes time to liquidate these assets, a trustee must act carefully. Selling illiquid assets requires a thorough understanding, and as trustee, it is your fiduciary duty to understand these transactions or seek the advice of someone who does.

Divesting publicly traded fossil fuel stocks and bonds is relatively simple.  While it can be beneficial to consider the timing of your sale with movements in the market, generally you can contact your portfolio manager or log onto your trading account directly and liquidate these stocks or ETFs within minutes.

Unlike public equity investments, mineral interests and royalty rights investments cannot be liquidated at known market prices instantaneously.  Rather, the price and the terms of the deal must be agreed to by both the buyer and the seller.

What Are Your Mineral and Royalty Rights Worth?

One of the most common methods used to value mineral and royalty rights is a discounted cash flow analysis.  The holders of royalty rights receive a monthly payment similar to that of a bond holder or commercial real estate lessor.  Thus, future payments can be predicted and then discounted back to the present.  However, the payments to a royalty holder can drastically increase or cease entirely without the say of the royalty holder.  This makes the prediction of future cash flows used to value the asset much more difficult.  Future cash flows must consider the current and future oil price environment, future levels of production, decline curves, the financial strength of current operators, and many other factors.  As we explain in our whitepaper, How to Value an Oil and Gas Royalty Interest,

To perform a royalty’s DCF analysis, production levels must be projected over the well’s useful life. Given that well production decreases at a decreasing rate, these projections can be calculated through deriving a decline rate from historical production. Revenue is a function of both production and price; as such, after developing a legitimate prediction of production volumes, analysts must predict future price.  The stream of income (revenue less taxes and deductions) is then discounted back to present value using a discount rate that accounts for risk in the industry.”

The guideline transaction approach can also provide a helpful indication of value. To develop an indication of mineral royalty interest value using the market approach, you can utilize data from market transactions of mineral interests in similar plays. Acquisition data can be utilized to calculate valuation multiples that take into account industry factors (or at least the market participants’ perception of these factors) far more directly than the asset-based approach or income-based approach.  In many ways, this approach goes straight to the heart of value: mineral interests and royalty rights are worth what someone is willing to pay for them.

Offer Letters

Adding to the uncertainty surrounding the value of royalty rights, the majority of mineral interest and royalty right owners with whom we work receive a couple, if not dozens, of offer letters every year. While offer letters, like transactions, do provide an indication of what someone is willing to pay for the asset, the definition of fair market value includes both a willing buyer and a willing seller.  Since these offers are only half of the equation, they should not be used in isolation as an indication of value.  As shown in the excerpt from the offer letter below, the distinction between fair market value and offer prices is critical in order to protect yourself from brokers attempting to profit at your expense.

Offer letters generally offer a multiple of average monthly cash flow on your revenue checks.  These multiples can range widely, often from less than 60x to more than 200x monthly cash flow.  Unfortunately, there is not one benchmark that can be applied to monthly cash flows across the nation, or even within one basin, so there is not an easy way to determine if you are receiving a fair price.

Especially after the fall in oil prices in mid-2014, we saw many offers that used scare tactics to try to persuade royalty owners to sell their interests at absurdly low prices.  Since the crash in oil prices, many royalty owners stopped receiving royalty checks; however, this does not mean their royalty interests are worthless.  Even now that oil prices have recovered and production is at an all-time high, some offer letters seek to take advantage of inexperienced royalty owners by suggesting that recent acquisitions, drilling activity, or changes in production have increased the risk, and therefore, decreased the value of their investment.  An understanding of royalty and mineral prices is not common to the average and even advanced investor and information about royalty and mineral rights is scare and difficult to find.  This, unfortunately, means that these scare tactics often work.

A recent offer letter to one of our clients read,

“As you may know, Hess Corporation has sold their interest in this unit. But there is another risk factor, as well. While it's hard to see on your revenue checks, from 2015 to 2016 the production declined by 10.1%. The decline over the past 30 years has been 1.7%. While the decline has improved this year, it makes one wonder what the decline will be in the future. As a mineral owner in this unit, it certainly has my attention. I'm making this aggressive offer in the belief it will go back to historical declines.”

This offer of 90x monthly cash flow was received in August, following the announcement of the acquisition.  By October when the details of the acquisition had been further explained to the investor community, our client had received another offer for approximately 140x monthly cash flow.

While there are legitimate online brokers who will buy your royalty interest for a fair price, the best solution is to know and understand the value of your asset before you start searching for a credible buyer.

The Value of Mineral Interests and Royalty Rights

As explained in our post "Before Selling Your Oil and Gas Royalty Interest Read This," we believe there are three points you need to understand before selling your mineral interest and royalty rights.

  1. Understand what you are selling
  2. Recognize production and price as value drivers
  3. Understand the location’s impact
The responsibility of divesting fossil fuels assets, especially for churches, often falls to a volunteer board that is tasked with much more than overseeing the divestiture of their fossil fuel portfolio.  It is the board’s fiduciary duty to ensure that the endowment is operating in the best interest of its beneficiaries which means, they need to ensure they receive a fair price for their assets. At Mercer Capital we have valued mineral and royalty rights in located across the country.  We understand how the location of your assets affects value and work to monitor transactions in each region to understand the state of the current market.   Contact a Mercer Capital professional today to discuss your valuation and transaction advisory needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty