Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

September 8, 2020

Themes from Q2 2020 Earnings Calls

Part 2: E&P Operators

As discussed in our quarterly E&P newsletter, the oil & gas industry experienced a volatile path to price stability as COVID-19 and the Saudi-Russia price war took a toll on supply and demand.  The road to recovery was apparent late in the quarter and was driven by supply cuts from OPEC+, curtailments by U.S. producers, and an increase in demand.  In this post, we capture the key takeaways from E&P operator second quarter 2020 earnings calls.

Theme 1: Cost Reductions Expected to Persist

One recurring theme among E&P operators in our prior E&P operator earnings calls quarterly overview included a continued focus on capital discipline.  The six E&P operators we track typically characterize this concept as the reduction of operational costs and capital expenditures in the pursuit of increased operational and capital efficiencies.  To that effect, all six operators pursued this goal in the second quarter, with most indicating the expectation that a substantial portion of these cost reductions will persist beyond the current environment of suppressed crude oil prices and uncertain projected economic activity.

  • We expect capital efficiencies to increase across both the Bakken and the South in 2020.  In the Bakken, we have achieved a 12% reduction to completed well costs.  In the South, we've achieved a 10% reduction to our overall South completed well cost.  70% of these reductions are structural in the Bakken, and 80% of these reductions are structural in the South, driven by all aspects of our operations. – William Berry, CEO, Continental Resources, Inc.
  • This flexibility, combined with mature production base and the structural well cost savings we have delivered, underpins our outlook for durable cash flow generation, as we were able to reduce our reinvestment rate, while maintaining production levels in a low-price environment. – Joseph Gatto, President & CEO, Callon Petroleum Company
  • Diamondback has further adjusted downward our already low-cost structure and is prepared to operate successfully in a lower-for-longer oil price environment.  A lot of the efficiency and cost gains made during this downturn will become permanent and will benefit Diamondback shareholders in a recovery. – Travis Stice, CEO, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
  • When you look at these efficiency gains combined with service cost deflation and a consistent development strategy, we continue to drive down our well costs and drastically improve capital efficiency.  As you can see […] we have reduced our well cost by approximately $1.8 million or 20% in the first two quarters of 2020.  We believe that approximately 60% of these cost reductions are sustainable. – Joey Hall, Executive Vice President – Permian Operations, Pioneer Natural Resources Company

Theme 2: Emphasis on Free Cash Flow to Reduce Debt and Reinforce Dividends

In our prior quarterly analysis, we noted that the operators seemed inclined to comment on their priorities moving forward.  This was a recurring theme in the Q2 earnings calls.  Short of referring to any such commentary as official guidance, most operators still discussed three to five year strategic goals, driven primarily by the growth of free cash flow projected to result from the cost reductions outlined previously.  Among the priorities set forth by the operators, the two primary goals cited included debt reduction and providing for attractive dividends to shareholders.

  • As I think about the first half of this year, we've made real progress on several priorities that will position us for the future: maximizing our cash flow by adjusting our spend rate, production and cost structure; increasing the strength of our balance sheet; continuing to return capital to shareholders through our dividend; and managing the oil price volatility with capital discipline, while also preserving our operational capacity. – Tim Leach, Chairman & CEO, Concho Resources Inc.
  • With our reduction in forward capital spending, and expectation for true free cash flow generation at current commodity prices in the second half of 2020 and 2021, we will look to reduce both gross and net debt while continuing to return capital to our shareholders through our base dividend. – Travis Stice, CEO, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
  • Initially we'd be looking to prioritize a bit of debt reduction as we then look to ease back into a base dividend structure.  And then, in excess of that, there are a lot of other vehicles that we could consider the variable dividend is one, but certainly even share repurchases is another.  I mean, nothing would be off the table. – Lee Tillman, President & CEO, Marathon Oil Company

Theme 3: Expectation of Little to No Production Growth… Mostly

Remarkably, the pursuit of production growth was not presented as an immediate priority by most operators at this time.

  • We were saying essentially that – and early on – that we should not be, as an industry, overproducing into an oversupplied market. – William Berry, CEO, Continental Resources, Inc.
  • Certainly, we're not seeing any signals that growth is needed from Diamondback or from our industry in general.  So, growth in today's world is pretty much off the table. – Travis Stice, CEO, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
  • Today, the world simply does not need more of our product. – Lee Tillman, President & CEO, Marathon Oil Company
The exception was Pioneer Natural Resources, which was the only operator that specifically cited a positive production growth rate estimate:
  • We say 5% plus on production growth, some years it maybe 6%, some years it maybe 7%, but we don’t want to just tie to one number based on rig activity, DUC activity, frac fleet activity.  We can’t hit 5% every year, so we want the flexibility, some years it maybe 7%, 8%, some years it maybe 4%, some years it maybe 5%, and so we’re just saying 5% plus on production growth over the next several years. – Scott Sheffield, CEO, Pioneer Natural Resources Company

On the Horizon

The E&P operator earnings calls broadly paint the picture of a mature industry in uncertain times.  The name of the game at this juncture is to shore up the balance sheet, increase efficiencies through capital discipline, and signal resilience by way of free cash flow growth and reinforced dividends to shareholders.

However, as these companies stand relatively still as they fortify their positions for sustaining operations over the long-haul, changes and evolution are on the horizon.  Most prominently, the U.S. presidential election looms around the corner.  There is no indication of a consensus among the E&P operators regarding the likelihood of a regime change, or what changes would likely affect the industry if faced with a Democratic Biden administration.

It should also be noted that the majority of the E&P operators have forthcoming formal ESG reports, with most slated to come out later this year.  We expect these topics will be featured in our next quarterly review of the E&P operator earnings calls.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty