Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

September 23, 2021

Bakken Recovery Falters

The economics of Oil & Gas production vary by region. Mercer Capital focuses on trends in the Eagle Ford, Permian, Bakken, and Marcellus and Utica plays. The cost of producing oil and gas depends on the geological makeup of the reserve, depth of reserve, and cost to transport the raw crude to market. We can observe different costs in different regions depending on these factors. This quarter we take a closer look at the Bakken.

Production and Activity Levels

Estimated Bakken production (on a barrels of oil equivalent, or “boe” basis) decreased approximately 4% year-over-year through September.  Production in the Permian and Appalachia increased 10% and 3% year-over-year, respectively, while the Eagle Ford’s production declined 2%.  While production in the Bakken rebounded sharply once wells were brought back online aftercurtailments in mid-2020, it has generally trended lower during 2021.  Production in the Eagle Ford and Permian was meaningfully impacted in February 2021, driven by Winter Storm Uri that disrupted power supplies throughout Texas.

As of September 17th, there were 23 rigs in the Bakken up 156% from September 11, 2020.  Eagle Ford, Permian, and Appalachia rig counts were up 300%, 109%, and 34%, respectively, over the same period. One may wonder why Bakken production has been on the decline given substantial rig count growth, while Permian production has continued to increase despite a more moderate increase in rigs.  The answer has to do with legacy production declines and new well production per rig.  Based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the Bakken needs roughly 19 rigs running to offset existing production declines.  That number for the Permian is approximately 200 rigs.  The Bakken’s rig count only recently broke above that maintenance level of drilling, whereas the Permian has had over 200 active drilling rigs since February 2021.  Current activity in the Bakken should stem the recent production declines, but growth will likely be modest without additional rigs.

Oil Stabilizes while Natural Gas Soars

After a significant run-up in the first two quarters of the year, oil prices were largely range-bound during the third quarter of 2021, with front-month futures prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) generally oscillating between $65/bbl and $75/bbl.  Rising COVID-19 cases in the U.S. caused the Delta variant to put a damper on travel activity and associated fuel consumption.  However, producers seem to be maintaining their capital discipline even in light of higher prices, which is limiting production growth.  Henry Hub natural gas front-month futures prices began the quarter at approximately $3.63/mmbtu but broke above $5.00/mmbtu in September.  The current run-up in natural gas prices has some concerned about what the winter may hold, when prices generally increase due to heating demand.  In Europe, declining coal capacity and less-than-expected wind generation from North Sea wind turbines have contributed to surging natural gas prices, and the situation is beginning to impact industrial production.

However, the current commodity price environment may be short-lived.  Commodity futures prices are in backwardation (meaning that current prices are higher than future prices), implying some near-term tightness that is expected to subside.  This sentiment is echoed by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which stated in their September 2021 Short-term Energy Outlookthat “growth in production from OPEC+, U.S. tight oil, and other non-OPEC countries will outpace slowing growth in global oil consumption” and would likely lead to lower oil prices.

Financial Performance

The Bakken public comp group saw strong stock price performance over the past year (through September 20th), with all constituents outperforming the broader E&P sector (as proxied by XOP).  Continental and Whiting prices increased 175% and 151% year-over-year, compared to the XOP’s increase of 78%.  Oasis, which emerged from bankruptcy in November 2020, is up 191% from its initial closing price post-bankruptcy.  However, this impressive stock price performance is probably more reflective of the dire straits of these companies last year.  Both Whiting and Oasis declared bankruptcy in 2020 and appear to have benefited from a cleaned-up capital structure.

Keystone XL Finally Cancelled

The Keystone XL pipeline, originally proposed in 2008, was finally cancelled by its developer, Canadian midstream company TC Energy.  President Biden revoked a key permit needed for the project on his first day in office.

The proposed pipeline caused significant controversy during its planning stages as it provided takeaway capacity for production from Alberta oil sands (which is more energy intensive, and thus less sustainable, than other forms of hydrocarbon extraction) and its path through Nebraska’s environmentally sensitive Sandhills region and Ogallala Aquifer.  Keystone XL also would have provided additional pipeline capacity out of the Bakken, which could become very needed if the also-controversial Dakota Access Pipeline gets shutdown.

Conclusion

While the Bakken saw strong production increases in the wake of mid-2020’s commodity price rout, that recovery appears to have faltered in 2021.  Production has generally been on the decline this year, though the recent increase in rigs operating in the basin should stem this decrease and provide for modest production growth going forward.  However, companies’ current emphasis on returning cash to shareholders may lead to less investment than has been seen in previous periods with similar commodity price environments.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America, and around the world.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty