Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
shutterstock_729725461-1.jpg

September 23, 2021

Bakken Recovery Falters

The economics of Oil & Gas production vary by region. Mercer Capital focuses on trends in the Eagle Ford, Permian, Bakken, and Marcellus and Utica plays. The cost of producing oil and gas depends on the geological makeup of the reserve, depth of reserve, and cost to transport the raw crude to market. We can observe different costs in different regions depending on these factors. This quarter we take a closer look at the Bakken.

Production and Activity Levels

Estimated Bakken production (on a barrels of oil equivalent, or “boe” basis) decreased approximately 4% year-over-year through September.  Production in the Permian and Appalachia increased 10% and 3% year-over-year, respectively, while the Eagle Ford’s production declined 2%.  While production in the Bakken rebounded sharply once wells were brought back online aftercurtailments in mid-2020, it has generally trended lower during 2021.  Production in the Eagle Ford and Permian was meaningfully impacted in February 2021, driven by Winter Storm Uri that disrupted power supplies throughout Texas.

As of September 17th, there were 23 rigs in the Bakken up 156% from September 11, 2020.  Eagle Ford, Permian, and Appalachia rig counts were up 300%, 109%, and 34%, respectively, over the same period. One may wonder why Bakken production has been on the decline given substantial rig count growth, while Permian production has continued to increase despite a more moderate increase in rigs.  The answer has to do with legacy production declines and new well production per rig.  Based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the Bakken needs roughly 19 rigs running to offset existing production declines.  That number for the Permian is approximately 200 rigs.  The Bakken’s rig count only recently broke above that maintenance level of drilling, whereas the Permian has had over 200 active drilling rigs since February 2021.  Current activity in the Bakken should stem the recent production declines, but growth will likely be modest without additional rigs.

Oil Stabilizes while Natural Gas Soars

After a significant run-up in the first two quarters of the year, oil prices were largely range-bound during the third quarter of 2021, with front-month futures prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) generally oscillating between $65/bbl and $75/bbl.  Rising COVID-19 cases in the U.S. caused the Delta variant to put a damper on travel activity and associated fuel consumption.  However, producers seem to be maintaining their capital discipline even in light of higher prices, which is limiting production growth.  Henry Hub natural gas front-month futures prices began the quarter at approximately $3.63/mmbtu but broke above $5.00/mmbtu in September.  The current run-up in natural gas prices has some concerned about what the winter may hold, when prices generally increase due to heating demand.  In Europe, declining coal capacity and less-than-expected wind generation from North Sea wind turbines have contributed to surging natural gas prices, and the situation is beginning to impact industrial production.

However, the current commodity price environment may be short-lived.  Commodity futures prices are in backwardation (meaning that current prices are higher than future prices), implying some near-term tightness that is expected to subside.  This sentiment is echoed by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which stated in their September 2021 Short-term Energy Outlookthat “growth in production from OPEC+, U.S. tight oil, and other non-OPEC countries will outpace slowing growth in global oil consumption” and would likely lead to lower oil prices.

Financial Performance

The Bakken public comp group saw strong stock price performance over the past year (through September 20th), with all constituents outperforming the broader E&P sector (as proxied by XOP).  Continental and Whiting prices increased 175% and 151% year-over-year, compared to the XOP’s increase of 78%.  Oasis, which emerged from bankruptcy in November 2020, is up 191% from its initial closing price post-bankruptcy.  However, this impressive stock price performance is probably more reflective of the dire straits of these companies last year.  Both Whiting and Oasis declared bankruptcy in 2020 and appear to have benefited from a cleaned-up capital structure.

Keystone XL Finally Cancelled

The Keystone XL pipeline, originally proposed in 2008, was finally cancelled by its developer, Canadian midstream company TC Energy.  President Biden revoked a key permit needed for the project on his first day in office.

The proposed pipeline caused significant controversy during its planning stages as it provided takeaway capacity for production from Alberta oil sands (which is more energy intensive, and thus less sustainable, than other forms of hydrocarbon extraction) and its path through Nebraska’s environmentally sensitive Sandhills region and Ogallala Aquifer.  Keystone XL also would have provided additional pipeline capacity out of the Bakken, which could become very needed if the also-controversial Dakota Access Pipeline gets shutdown.

Conclusion

While the Bakken saw strong production increases in the wake of mid-2020’s commodity price rout, that recovery appears to have faltered in 2021.  Production has generally been on the decline this year, though the recent increase in rigs operating in the basin should stem this decrease and provide for modest production growth going forward.  However, companies’ current emphasis on returning cash to shareholders may lead to less investment than has been seen in previous periods with similar commodity price environments.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America, and around the world.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty