Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
shutterstock_1168120510.jpg

June 24, 2021

Permian Production Pushes Higher

The economics of Oil & Gas production vary by region. Mercer Capital focuses on trends in the Eagle Ford, Permian, Bakken, and Marcellus and Utica plays. The cost of producing oil and gas depends on the geological makeup of the reserve, depth of reserve, and cost to transport the raw crude to market. We can observe different costs in different regions depending on these factors. In this post, we take a closer look at the Permian.

Production and Activity Levels

Estimated Permian production increased approximately 8% year-over-year through June, though current production remains below the peak observed in March 2020.  Production in Appalachia increased 5% year-over-year, while the Eagle Ford’s production was essentially flat.  The largest production gain was observed in the Bakken (up 26%), as the Bakken saw a high level of shut-in wells(in response to low commodity prices) which have subsequently been brought back online.  Permian production has generally been increasing over the past year, but there was a meaningful decline in February driven by Winter Storm Uri that disrupted power supplies throughout Texas.

The Permian’s production increase is the result of more drilling activity in the basin.  There were 237 rigs in the Permian as of June 18th, up 73% from June 12, 2020.  Bakken and Eagle Ford rig counts were up 55% and 146%, respectively, while the Appalachia rig count was down 3%. Permian production should continue to increase modestly over the next several months based on the current rig count, legacy production declines, and new-well production per rig.

Commodity Prices Grind Higher

The second quarter of 2021 saw rising commodity prices, driven largely by accelerating travel and economic activity amid the vaccine rollout and fewer COVID cases in many parts of the world.  Front-month WTI futures began the quarter at ~$60/bbl and broke above $70/bbl before the end of the quarter.  The rise in prices was generally slow and steady, with the exception of a dip in mid-May, though that was likely driven by short-term dislocations caused by the shutdown of the Colonial Pipelinein response to a ransomware attack.  Henry Hub natural gas front-month futures prices began the quarter at approximately $2.60/mmbtu and have been above $3/mmbtu for all of June thus far.

However, the current commodity price environment may be short-lived.  WTI futures prices are in backwardation (meaning that current prices are higher than future prices), implying some near-term tightness that is expected to subside.  This sentiment is echoed by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which stated that “continuing growth in production from OPEC+ and accelerating growth in U.S. tight oil production—along with other supply growth—will outpace decelerating growth in global oil consumption and contribute to declining oil prices” in their June 2021 Short-term Energy Outlook.

Financial Performance

In a nice change of pace for energy investors, the Permian public comp group saw strong stock price performance over the past year (through June 22nd).  All of the Permian companies except Pioneer outperformed the broader E&P sector, as proxied by XOP (which was up 73% during the past twelve months).  That stock price performance is probably more reflective of the dire straits of some companies last year in the aftermath of the Saudi/Russian price war and COVID-19 lockdowns, as small, leveraged companies like Centennial and Laredo have had the biggest gains.  However, stock prices for all of the Permian comp group companies remain below all-time highs.

Federal Lands Drilling Ban Could Shift Production Within the Basin

Part of President Biden’s environmental platform was banning new oil and gas permitting on public lands.  An initial action under this platform was a 60-day moratorium on permitting activity, though that was recently blocked by a federal judge.  While many think a ban would haverelatively modest impacts at a macro level, the impacts could be more severe for companies and areas with a high level of exposure to federal lands.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas performed an analysis to look at the potential impact to the Permian Basin.  Under a restrictive policy scenario, production growth would slow (relative to no change in policy), though overall production from the basin is still expected to increase.[1]

However, approximately half of New Mexico’s Oil & Gas production comes from federal acreage.  As such, the impacts to New Mexico are much more acute under a restrictive policy scenario.  The consequence is a shifting of drilling activity (and associated employment and spending) from New Mexico to Texas.

Conclusion

The Permian was not immune to the impacts of historically low oil prices observed in 2020, though it has proven to be resilient.  Production, while still below peak levels, is growing, and growth is generally expected to continue.  Activity levels are improving, though companies’ current emphasis on returning cash to shareholders may lead to less investment than has been seen in previous periods with similar commodity price environments.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America, and around the world.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.


[1] The Dallas Fed describes the policy scenarios as follows:

  • Reference Case: This serves as the benchmark and assumes little-changed leasing, permitting and drilling from first-quarter 2021 levels.
  • Hybrid Case: It assumes no new federal leasing, but existing leaseholders continue receiving drilling permits. Permit reviews are more rigorous, leading to slower approvals and a costlier operating environment beginning in 2022. Based on companies’ public statements, firms that hold acreage across the basin gradually relocate drilling rigs and completion crews to their nonfederal locations.
  • Restrictive Case: No new federal permits or extensions are granted starting in 2023. This is when the most-recently issued permits will expire. The existing permitting freeze adversely affects production in the near-term due to a lack of approvals of permit modifications and pipeline rights-of-way. As in the Hybrid Case, companies shift their focus to nonfederal acreage.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty