Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

May 20, 2021

Themes from Q1 2021 Earnings Calls

Part 2: Mineral Aggregators

Last week, we reviewed the first quarter earnings calls for a select group of E&P companies and briefly discussed the macroeconomic factors affecting the oil and gas industry.  In this post, we focus on the key takeaways from mineral aggregator first quarter 2021 earnings calls.

Favorable M&A Outlook

Transaction volume was largely muted throughout 2020 as the depressed pricing environment drove bid-ask spreads wider.  Buyers were offering what they believed was supportable based on current market conditions, and sellers were convinced that their assets were being undervalued.  This led to sellers holding onto assets for dear life unless they were forced to liquidate.  As mineral aggregators have the reputation to reinvest capital, participants on the earnings calls were intrigued to learn about their strategy in what many believe may be a price recovery environment.

  • “We had a stock price where we didn't really feel like the equity was a usable acquisition currency, and I think sellers still had higher expectations than the environment warranted.  And so with prices and equity recovering, and frankly where sellers were sitting on those assets for another 12 to 18 months, we think the environment is just getting much more constructive.” Jeffrey Wood, President & CFO, Black Stone Minerals
  • “Since the third quarter of last year, we've continued deploying capital to mineral acquisitions and believe the assets we've acquired over the past three quarters will generate differentiated performance over the next several years.  We will continue to employ our disciplined underwriting of deals to enhance shareholder value and at the same time see more of our acquisitions internally funded via retained cash.” Bud Brigham, Founder & Executive Chairman, Brigham Minerals

Hedging

Hedging strategies differed among the aggregators.  Some companies, like Black Stone and Viper, executed hedges that mitigated risk in 2020, but have been a detriment to recent financial performance.  On the contrary, Brigham Minerals stated that their hedging portfolio was minimal which allowed them to participate in the positive pricing environment seen in the first quarter.

  • “As most of you are aware, we have always been active hedgers of our commodity risk. Those hedges benefited us greatly last year when prices cratered, but also tempered the impact of the dramatic rise in prices for us during the first quarter.” Jeffrey Wood, President & CFO, Black Stone Minerals
  • “First, we did not need to panic at any point during the rollercoaster year of 2020 and execute hedges, which today are currently serving as strong headwinds to numerous companies in the energy space. Here at Brigham, we are managers of a premier mineral portfolio, non-commodity traders and we prefer to give our investors full exposure to the commodity.” Bud Brigham, Founder & Executive Chairman, Brigham Minerals
  • “Also, we believe our hedging strategy is a prudent methodology for managing the company’s future price risks on oil and natural gas. Having substantial hedges in place on a rolling two-year basis before the price shocks that occurred in 2020 proves to be a very effective risk mitigation strategy.” Davis Ravnaas, President, CFO & Chairman, Kimbell Royalty Partners
  • “We had a lot of ‘21 hedges put on this year that are unfortunately, underwater because of the recovery. But I think as you think about 2022 and beyond, putting some sort of floor under the low end of distributable cash flow is something we’re thinking about.” Kaes Van’t Hof, President, Viper Energy Partners

Debt Situation

Aggregators continued to pay down debt and improve liquidity, which was a major priority heading into the new year.  Relationships with lenders was a concern during 2020, but Jeffrey Wood, President and CFO of Black Stone Minerals, stated that the company was able to execute a favorable extension to their existing debt facility.  This is a positive sign for the industry moving forward.  Aggregators will continue to allocate free cash flow between debt paydown and shareholder return as the year progresses.

  • “After the end of the quarter, we finalized an extension of our existing revolving credit facility last week. We added 2 years to the maturity date of that facility, which is now November of 2024.  It's been a very difficult bank market over the past year, so we're really happy to get this extension done with relatively minor modifications to the terms of the facility and we appreciate the continued support from our long-term lending relationships.”Jeffrey Wood, President & CFO, Black Stone Minerals
  • “As we have done in previous quarters, the company utilized 25% of its Q4 2020 cash available for distribution to pay down a portion of the credit facility in Q1 2020. Since May 2020, the company has paid down approximately $25 million in debt by allocating a portion of its cash flow to debt paid down.  We expect to continue to allocate 25% of our cash available for distribution for debt pay down in the future.”Davis Ravnaas, President, CFO & Chairman, Kimbell Royalty Partners
  • “As a result, Viper generated almost $55 million in net cash from operating activities, which enabled us to reduce debt by $27 million during the quarter. We have now reduced total debt by over $136 million, or roughly 20%, over the past 12 months.” Travis Stice, CEO, Viper Energy Partners

Conclusion

It is safe to say that sentiment among the participants was positive in the first quarter earnings calls, especially relative to last year.  Aggregators seemed to grind through 2020 and flip the script for a new year.  Although a price recovery may be in sight, challenges remain, specifically with the Biden Administration taking office.  The calls largely glossed over political implications of the new administration but those issues may come into focus as the year unfolds.

Mercer Capital has its finger on the pulse of the minerals market.  An important trend has been the rise of mineral aggregators, which have largely supplanted the trusts as the primary method of publicly traded minerals ownership.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty