Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

March 1, 2021

Themes from Q4 2020 Earnings Calls

E&P Operators

As discussed in our recent blog post regarding tempered mineral and royalty valuations despite recent oil price gains, sentiment towards the oil & gas sector turned bullish as the fourth quarter progressed, with WTI crude spot prices surpassing $40/barrel and – more importantly – generally staying the course on an upward trajectory to close out the year.  Over the fourth quarter, WTI spot prices rose 21% from $40.05/barrel at the close of September 30 to $48.35/barrel at December 31.  Similarly, Brent spot prices increased 27% from $40.30/barrel to $51.22/barrel over the fourth quarter.

One key factor supporting this price appreciation was OPEC’s decision to not flood the global market with crude oil.  The election in November concluded with the election of Biden to the White House, a Democratic majority in the House, and uncertainty in the Senate as Georgia would have runoff elections in early January with its two seats – both held by Republican candidates – challenged by Democratic candidates.

Despite little indication as to what, precisely, the legislative branch would look like following the Georgia Senate runoff elections, the national election results up to that point made it clear that the oil & gas industry would most likely face headwinds from Washington D.C. with respect to industry operations.  Energy prices, however, did not seem to reflect a change in course either way.  In this post, we capture the key takeaways from fourth quarter 2020 earnings calls from E&P operators.

Heightened Caution Regarding Price Volatility

Throughout the earnings calls, the absence of COVID-19 as a factor of uncertainty was particularly striking.  The majority of references to the pandemic were in passing, usually to provide context of the operational status in the fourth quarter 2020 relative to the same period in the prior year.  Only one company executive, Harold Hamm of Continental, directly cited the role of public optimism regarding vaccinations as a driving factor behind the recent rebalancing of global crude oil inventories.

It appears as though the impact of the COVID pandemic on energy demand is no longer considered as much of a wildcard in E&P operators’ forecasts as it was earlier in the year.

While the pandemic is no longer a surprise, with operators fairly optimistic about short-term (1 to 3 years) projections, there is still the poignant memory of crude oil futures prices dipping into negative territory nearly a year ago.  Yes, it has almost been a year already.  The memory is indeed still very fresh, and operators are looking to protect themselves accordingly, whether via hedging or with greater conservatism regarding return of capital to shareholders by way of dividends.

“Our hedge book really helps on just the comfort and confidence and what these cash flows look like for the next several years with approximately 90% [of volumes hedged] in 2021.  We already have a material position in 2022.  And then if you look at 2023 and 2024, it's getting close to almost being 50% hedged…”Don Rush, CFO, CNX Resources Corp.

“Historically, [Occidental Petroleum has not] regularly engaged in hedging, preferring to realize the prices over the cycle, that delivers the most buyer shareholders.  But we did…take on an oil hedge in 2020 that had a collar in 2020, but then it also had a call provision in 2021.”–Rob Peterson, CFO, Occidental Petroleum Corp.

“[We are] sticking with our priorities of managing capital expenditures supportive [of a] flatter production profile, then combined with protective hedges allows for maximum free cash flow generation, strong liquidity and debt reduction in long-term price recovery...”Roger Jenkins, CEO, Murphy Oil Corp.

“Our primary focus will be debt pay down, but we are also focused on the eventual reinstating of our dividend…  At this time, we would like to build more protection against price volatility by paying down debt, but our management and the board are aligned in wanting to see the return of a sustainable and growing dividend sometime in the near future.”John Hart, CFO, Continental Resources, Inc.

Positive Free Cash Flow

Despite the price volatility leading up to the fourth quarter, many operators either posted annual free cash flows well in advance of projections, or at least finished 2020 on a positive note.

“2020 marked the most successful year we've seen as an E&P and, frankly, as a public company going back to the late 1990s, as measured by free cash flow…Our original guidance for 2020 free cash flow is around $135 million, compared to over the $356 million that we actually posted.”Nick Deluliis, President & CEO, CNX Resources Corp.

“Our fifth consecutive year of free cash flow, we said, we'd generate $200 million.  We generated nearly 40% more, $275 million.”William Berry, CEO, Continental Resources, Inc.

“Even as activity levels increased in the fourth quarter and we returned to paying deferred dividends and cash, we still generated approximately $800 million of free cash flow…”–Rob Peterson, CFO, Occidental Petroleum Corp.

“Free cash flow during the quarter was $155 million.” Glen Warren, Jr., Antero Resources Corp.

ESG

Compared to our review of themes in the third quarter E&P earnings calls, the fourth quarter earnings calls had a bit more discussion concerning ESG initiatives, including plans of action beyond “we expect to publish our ESG plan soon.”

“Our enhanced oil recovery projects [have] turned into an ability for us to create a new business that not only will add additional value for our shareholders over time but reduces emissions in the world.  We'll be the leaders in helping to test direct air capture technology, put it in place, make it operational and commercial, and that will provide an opportunity for others to expand it in the world.”Vicki Hollub, President & CEO, Occidental Petroleum Corp.

“From a big picture perspective, if you look at sustainability and ESG…we translate what that means into really three crucial legs.  One, you got to be transparent…  Two, tangible, okay, these things, these targets, these metrics need to be measured.  They need to be tangible.  Like what did we actually deliver on?  And then the third piece of this is actions, right.  I think it's pretty simple across those three, but despite all the talk and the volume of stuff that's being bantered about across those metrics, I think those three things are lacking quite a bit.  We want to be in the camp of, ‘Hey, here's what we're going to do, transparently.  Here's what we're going to measure and accomplish tangibly.  And then here's what our actions were that were consistent with those two things.’” Nick Deluliis, President & CEO, CNX Resources Corp.

“Our operations team continues work on minimizing our environmental impact such as building a new produced water handling system, as well as utilizing bi-fuel hydraulic frac spreads on all well completions in Canada, which results in considerable CO2 emissions reductions.  While smaller changes individually, they add up to a larger impact over time.” Roger Jenkins, CEO, Murphy Oil Corp.

On the Horizon

Throughout 2020, the oil and gas sector was rife with uncertainty regarding the COVID pandemic and its short- and long-term impacts on the energy markets.  From some perspectives, there were 47 E&P operator bankruptcy filings in 2020.  The worst year in the past 5 years in terms of the number of E&P operator bankruptcy filings was 2016, with 70 filings.  However, some E&P operators proved that operational and capital discipline could still result in free cash flow sufficient to reduce debt and return capital to shareholders.

Despite the upward trend in crude oil and natural gas strip prices in the fourth quarter and generally favorable sentiment that the trend would likely continue into and through 2021, there was very little commentary on expectations of increasing rig activity.

Perhaps more surprisingly, and with the exception of Murphy Oil’s earnings call, there was also not much discussion regarding the Biden-Harris administration and its actions and intentions, which generally provide for stronger headwinds coming from Washington D.C. than what the industry has been used to over the prior four years.

We expect a clearer picture of E&P operators’ perspectives regarding future changes in the “boots on the ground” and regulatory environment in our next review of first-quarter 2021 earnings call themes.

For more information or to discuss a valuation or transaction issues in confidence, please contact us.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty