Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
shutterstock_367460771.jpg

December 16, 2022

Appalachian Production Holds True Despite Market Disruptions

The economics of Oil & Gas production vary by region. Mercer Capital focuses on trends in the Eagle Ford, Permian, Bakken, and Marcellus and Utica plays.  The cost of producing oil and gas depends on the geological makeup of the reserve, depth of reserve, and cost to transport the raw crude to market. We can observe different costs in different regions depending on these factors.  This quarter we take a closer look at the Marcellus and Utica shales.

Production and Activity Levels

Estimated Appalachian production (on a barrels of oil equivalent, or “boe” basis) decreased approximately 1% year-over-year through late December.  Production in the Eagle Ford, Permian, and Bakken increased 16%, 11%, and 5% year-over-year.  Despite a much-improved year-over-year commodity price environment, Appalachian production was fairly stable, largely due to high price volatility over the year, which left the markets uncertain as to where prices would be going forward.

Rig counts continued to climb in all four basins over the last year.  Growth rates in the Appalachian and Permian basins were more modest, while rates for the Bakken and Eagle Ford basins were notably higher.  The Appalachian rig count rose 30% from 40 to 52 rigs.  Among the oil-focused basins, the Eagle Ford led with a 71% increase from 42 to 72 rigs.  The Bakken followed with a 56% increase (27 to 42 rigs), while the Permian had the lowest increase with a 24% increase (283 to 350 rigs). As is typical, Appalachian production has been relatively flat despite its rig count growth.  That’s due to the basin’s higher production declines which necessitate a higher rig count to maintain production levels.

Commodity Price Volatility

Henry Hub natural gas front-month futures prices have experienced significant volatility over the latest year.  Prices began 2022 on a general upswing before rising sharply as the market reacted to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February.  As Russia subsequently began leveraging its natural gas supplies against Europe in retaliation of Europe’s response to the war in Ukraine, natural gas prices became notably more volatile.  They rose from an early March low of $4.56 to an early June high of $9.29 — only to drop back to $5.39 in late June and then hit a 2022 high of $9.42 in late August.  By mid-December, Henry Hub had declined, albeit with only lightly reduced volatility, to $5.79.

Oil prices, as benchmarked by West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent Crude (Brent), also began 2022 on a steady upward trend that took the WTI from $76/bbl to $88/bbl and the Brent from $79/bbl to $91/bbl, prior to the Russian invasion.  As the reality of the Russian-Ukraine war took hold, the oil benchmarks showed a marked uptick in volatility that lasted into mid-May, with prices hitting highs of $120/bbl and $128/bbl, and lows of $93/bbl and $96/bbl.  Since then, WTI and Brent prices have trended downward, exhibiting more typical volatility other than modest rallies in August and October.  As of mid-December, WTI sat at $73/bbl and Brent at $78/bbl.

Financial Performance

The Appalachian public comp group saw markedly strong stock price performance over the past year (through December 12th), led by Antero and EQT with price increases of 90% and 77% as of December 12th.  The remaining members of the comp group showed more modest 1-year price increases of 12% to 38%.  Prices peaked in early June for all members, except EQT, with year-to-date increases of 71% to 171%.  EQT’s stock price peaked in mid-September at a year-to-date increase of 143%.  Stock prices fell sharply beginning in mid-September but reversed direction immediately following the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea that transport Russian natural gas to northern Europe.

Antero and  EQT led the way among this group for several reasons.  For Antero, one reason appears to have been its lack of hedging for 2023, which has allowed it greater exposure to the uptick in gas prices and has allowed Antero to be aggressive in paying down debt.  EQT, on the other hand, does have more near-term hedging ceilings to deal with.  However, its strength is in its operational efficiencies, whereby their recent literature demonstrates breakeven operating expenses at $1.37 per mcf.  This is among the lowest in the industry and allows them to accumulate cash flow.

Conclusion

Appalachian production held steady in 2022 despite historically high commodity price volatility driven by the Russian-Ukraine war, the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, and rising LNG exports to Europe to stave-off potential winter heating shortages.  The Q4 Appalachian rig count is at a level beyond that needed for production volume maintenance, so there would seem to be at least some potential for Henry Hub price reductions going into 2023.  However, the demand for new natural gas supplies to Europe provides a countervailing wind to any potential downward movement in natural gas prices.  In the end, the natural gas markets seem to be in the midst of a series of events that promise continued supply and demand shifts with no certainty as to where the market will go in 2023.

We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world.  Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty