Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

April 17, 2017

What Would You Do with $1 Billion?

Less than one month ago investors bet $1 billion on James Hackett, former President and CEO of Anadarko Petroleum Corp.  Silver Run Acquisition Corp. II is a blank check company that will leverage James Hackett’s knowledge of the Eagle Ford Shale and Permian Basin to fund an opportunistic acquisition.  Silver Run II was created by the Riverstone Holdings LLC, the bank that successfully started the blank check company over a year ago now known as Centennial Resource Production LLC. The original stock sale for Silver Run Acquisition Corp I, which raised $900 million is expected to exceed $1 billion.  If the banks managing the deal exercise their options to buy shares, which they generally do, the Company would be tied for the record largest blank-check offering.  Before we review the recent uptick in investment in oil and gas blank check companies, we will review the basics of blank check companies and special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs).

What Is a Blank Check Company?

A blank check company, as defined by the SEC, is a “development stage company that has no specific business plan or purpose or has indicated its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, other entity, or person.”  Because the acquisition opportunity has yet to be identified, investors do not know how their funds will be spent, so they write a blank check to the company.  One kind of blank check company is a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC).

What Is a SPAC?

Alice Hsu, Partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, explained “SPACs are newly formed shell companies, without any revenue or operating history, that raise proceeds in an IPO” in order to finance a merger or acquisition in a specific timeframe.  The money raised goes into a separate trust that can only be used for an eventual merger or acquisition.  At least 80% of the assets held in the trust account must be used to fund the acquisition of the target business or businesses.  If a SPAC does not meet certain goals within a specified time frame, generally 18 to 24 months, then the company will liquidate and return the pro-rata share of funds to investors.

SPACs raise capital through IPOs, in which one unit and its attached warrant is typically priced at $10, making them “penny stocks.”  A short period after the IPO, the common stock and the warrants comprising one unit will begin separate trading at which point holders have the option to continue to hold their units or separate them.  SPACs are usually sponsored by an industry guru whose experience and knowledge of the industry gives them a unique position in to pursue acquisitions.   In 2007, there were 58 SPACs that completed IPOs.  But until 2016, oil and gas SPACs were uncommon.

Oil and Gas SPACs

Since the crash in oil prices in 2014, many oil and gas companies found themselves in dire need of capital.  Many distressed companies sold off non-core assets for heavy discounts in order to quickly generate cash to pay off debt and avoid bankruptcy. This gave investors a unique opportunity to pick up assets at low prices and SPAC’s provide a source of private capital to do this.

The first oil and gas SPAC, Avondale Acquisition (AACOU) founded in April 2015, never completed an IPO as its original sponsor former CEO of Chesapeake Energy & founder of American Energy Partners, LP, Aubrey McClendon, died in a car crash in March 2016.  The Company formally withdrew its plans for an IPO to raise $200 million in November 2016.

In early-2016 two oil and gas special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) successfully completed IPOs.  This included 2016’s largest U.S. IPO as of February 23, 2016: Silver Run Acquisition Corp.  Corrie Driebusch and Ryan Dezember of the WSJ said the size of the deal in “an otherwise frozen market for initial public offering” […] “reaffirms investors’ appetite for bottom-feeding in the oil and gas business.”  The timing the deal shows that investors believed in early 2016 that the oil and gas market had bottomed out and would rebound within the next two years when its term to make a deal would expire.

Where Are Oil and Gas SPACs Investing?

Silver Run Acquisition Corp (SRAQU) was sponsored by Mark Papa, former CEO of EOG Resources.  Silver Run Acquisition Corp raised $500 million when it began trading on the NASDAQ.  In July 2016, Silver Run acquired a controlling interest in Centennial Resource Production LLC, an independent natural gas company located in the core of the Delaware Basin.  Centennial has acreage in Reeves, Ward, and Pecos Counties.  The transaction was financed by Riverstone Holdings LLC, an energy investment banking firm.  After the transaction Silver Run was renamed Centennial Resource Development Corp (CDEV).

KLR Energy Acquisition Corp. (KLRE) raised approximately $85.1 million in its IPO.  It is sponsored by Gary Hanna, former CEO of EPL Oil and Gas Inc.  The Company announced a meeting date for stockholders to vote on the business combination with Tema Oil and Gas Company.  The meeting is scheduled for April 26, 2017.  Tema Oil and Gas Company is a privately held company operating in Texas and New Mexico and holds acreage in the core of the Deleware Basin in Loving County.  After the Closing of the transaction the Company will change its name to Rosehill Resources Inc. and will trade on the NASDAQ under the tickers ROSE, ROSEU, and ROSEW.

Kayne Anderson Acquisition Corp. started by a Los Angeles private equity firm which focuses on pipelines, raised $350 million in an IPO on March 30, 2017.   This SPAC is different than most others in the oil and gas space as they do not have one industry guru as a sponsor but rather are sponsored by Kayne Anderson Sponsor, LLC which is most likely run by a team of investors at Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, LLC.

After listing on the NASDAQ just last week, Vantage Energy Acquisition Corp. (VEACU), a blank check special purpose acquisition company, raised $480 million.  Vantage Energy Acquisition Corp. is sponsored by Roger Biemans who was the CEO of Vantage Energy until it sold to Rice Energy last October.  It is likely that Vantage Energy will pursue investment opportunities in the Marcellus Shale, as Roger Bieman’s former experience was centered there.

Additionally, it is rumored that Occidental Petroleum is in the talks to launch a SPAC sponsored by former CEO Stephen Chazen.

Conclusion

While the majority of M&A has been focused in the Permian Basin over the last year, the varying investments of oil and gas SPACs demonstrate that the knowledge of the industry experts is what investors find valuable.  Investment by SPACs has been higher of course in the Delaware Basin, but some of the SPACs are focusing on natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica as well.

The continuation of investment in oil and gas SPACs shows that investors still believe that there are opportunities to find bargain investments in the oil and gas space throughout many basins.  The emergence of oil and gas SPACs however is still recent and there is little history to understand the success of such companies.

Mercer Capital has significant experience valuing assets and companies in the energy and construction industries.  Our valuations have been reviewed and relied on by buyers and sellers and Big 4 Auditors. These valuations have been utilized to support valuations for IRS Estate and Gift Tax, GAAP accounting, and litigation purposes. Contact a Mercer Capital professional today to discuss your valuation needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty