Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
shutterstock_2364977019.jpg

July 3, 2018

Growing Pains Curb Valuation Gains in the Permian

2Q18 Review

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="337"]

Image result for bird swallowing fish too big for mouthToo much to swallow?[/caption]
The story of the Permian Basin in 2018 so far has been developing as one of the finest proverbial "fishing holes" in the world.  However, as the year has progressed, it appears many industry players have found their reputed "catch" too big to process and are scrambling to deal with it before it begins to stink. Translation: the year began with a flurry of developmental drilling activity followed by an emerging bottleneck.  The unintended consequence of this has been that some operators have been growing oil production too fast for pipeline and infrastructure to keep up.  A pricing differential has arisen due to the supply glut and there has been concurrent stagnation in valuations.  Here’s how some of it has transpired through the timeline of the first half of 2018.

Q1: Flocking to the Permian

The Permian's 2018 journey began on the same trajectory that 2017 ended with growth, investment, and more growth.  This has been for a good triumvirate of key reasons too:

  1. Estimates vary by county, producer, and information source, but according to Bloomberg Intelligence, recent break-even prices in the Permian were as low as $38 in both the Delaware and Midland Basins.3
  2. Some of the best shale stacked geology in the world, and
  3. Long-standing pre-existing infrastructure to get petroleum to market (the play has been active since the 1920's).
It's no wonder the Permian continued to attract operators and capital.  Capex budgets were not only growing for operators as a general matter, but increasingly higher percentages of those budgets were geared towards being spent in West Texas.  The chart below demonstrates this trend: Transactions in other basins were driven by motivations to re-deploy cash in the Delaware Basin, Midland Basin, or both.  We discussed this in a recent post.  Operators and mineral holders in other basins watched as activity and capital flocked to the Permian Basin.

Q2: Hydrocarbon Traffic Jam

However, plans, forecasts, and reality clashed around the end of the first quarter of 2018.  Although the takeaway capacity and infrastructure were present, it wasn't enough to keep up with growth, and it has burst at the seams.  This first began to be hinted at back in 2017, in regards to the growth and when new pipelines were coming online; it was discussed as a real problem issue in April with a few foreboding articles.

This has led to capacity issues on a meaningful scale and there's too much of a good thing as a result.  Goldman Sachs' research team put together an interesting infographic that was referenced by HFI Research that characterizes it well:

Local Permian Oil & Gas Prices: Falling Fast

This has led to a rapid change in local wellhead prices in the Permian.  As early as January 2018, wellhead prices in the Permian were trading at a premium to markets at Cushing, OK.  However, as seen below in this Bloomberg chart, the gap skyrocketed over the course of the next 45 days and is currently hovering around $12 per barrel.  The primary driver of this differential is nested in alternative transportation costs as shown above.  This glut of production has rendered local natural gas to an almost forgotten status.  In the Permian, natural gas at the wellhead is almost worthless in some cases.  There's nowhere for it to go, and many producers have little choice but to burn (or flare) its' gas at the wellhead.

It's not bad news for all in the oil patch.  Some players are embracing the turn of events.  Refiners are welcoming the low prices as they are able to arbitrage price differences at the gasoline pump and midstream producers are getting top dollar to transport more crude out of West Texas.  However, for many E&P producers (and royalty & mineral holders) this presents not only a problem from a pricing standpoint but from a future drilling standpoint as well.  Plans made as recently as a few months ago are undoubtedly being reconsidered by many producers.  The ones who have secured takeaway capacity are letting the market know about it.

Q3 and Beyond: Valuation Stagnation and what about Backwardation?

Valuations for Permian focused producers have stagnated this year.  Since January 1st only a handful of companies stock prices are up, while the majority have actually declined.

This would appear counterintuitive in light of the overall optimism in the space.  Doesn't that bottleneck restriction push prices higher?  Isn't that a good thing? The answer is true in many respects, and producers worldwide and in other basins are reaping the benefits of this.  However, as far as Permian focused producers are concerned, they don’t get these benefits.  They are getting around $60 per barrel, instead of $70+ right now. Also, remember that valuations are a function not only of reserves (which are just as robust and optimistic as they have been recently), but of ultimately the production, cash flow, and timing that result from the development of those reserves.  This development has impacted all three:
  • Production is anticipated to be curbed (at least until the bottleneck is dealt with – which might not be until late 2019 at this point);
  • Cash flow is impacted by both production limitations AND pricing differentials; and
  • Timing of when those cash flows will be received has been delayed.
Speakers at a recent ASA Energy Conference in Houston, mentioned that certain upstream management teams have expressed elements of frustration that investors have not rewarded valuations with the oncoming of robust Q1 earnings, particularly out of the Permian Basin.  We're not so sure that's the case.  Acreage grabbing has slowed and earnings are expected to follow with all of the favorable aspects of the Permian.  Perhaps trepidations about this bottleneck and pricing differentials have fueled concerns and hampered values. Additionally, if futures curves are any indication, there is an expectation that prices will return from the current $70+ environment back down into the low $50s per barrel in a few years.

However, the good news from a longer run perspective is that most producers make capital expenditure decisions from a longer-term perspective (several years out) due to the time it takes to deploy that capital and when it begins to make a return.  With break evens so low, this disruption – even if it lasts through 2019, does not change the longer term outlook in the Permian.  It mostly delays it, which is a good reason why stock values are on hold right now.

Mercer Capital has significant experience valuing assets and companies in the energy industry, primarily oil and gas, biofuels and other minerals.  Our oil and gas valuations have been reviewed and relied on by buyers and sellers and Big 4 Auditors. These oil and gas related valuations have been utilized to support valuations for IRS Estate and Gift Tax, GAAP accounting, and litigation purposes. We have performed oil and gas valuations and associated oil and gas reserves domestically throughout the United States and in foreign countries. Contact a Mercer Capital professional today to discuss your valuation needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty