Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

January 9, 2020

Q4 2019 Global Macro Review

U.S. Production Hits Milestones Amid Continued Global Political Tensions

Brent crude prices began the quarter around $59 per barrel and have steadily risen to around $68 to close out 2019. WTI pricing has risen at a similar pace although it continues to trail Brent pricing by about $7 per barrel. Natural gas, however, has been trending in the opposite direction as prices have steadily declined since the end of October. In this post, we will examine the macroeconomic factors that have affected prices in the fourth quarter.

Global Supply

OPEC conducted its 177th meeting on December 5th to take note of oil market developments since its last meeting in July and to review the oil market outlook for 2020.  Press reports leading up to the meeting indicated that OPEC would extend the existing supply cuts, helping support crude oil prices.  Ultimately, the group went a step further, deepening production cuts by 0.5 million b/d.  However, the cuts were not extended and only run through the end of March 2020.  According to the EIA’s latest Short-Term Energy Outlook (“STEO”), OPEC production is expected to fall in 2020.  This is largely related to production restraint from most OPEC members amid concerns of rising oil inventories, continuing sanctions on Iran, and ongoing declines in Venezuela’s crude oil production.  EIA forecasts that increased non-OPEC production will more than offset those declines and that global liquid fuels supply will rise by 1.5 million b/d in 2020.

International Maritime Organization 2020

Beginning on January 1, 2020, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) is set to enact the Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL Convention), which lowers the maximum sulfur content of marine fuel oil used in ocean-going vessels from 3.5% to 0.5%.  The implementation of MARPOL will see the marine fuels landscape change significantly as over 95% of the current market will be displaced.

The EIA demonstrates the recent shifts in share of OECD Europe oil imports. These trends could continue in 2020 based on the IMO 2020 regulations.  The EIA expects U.S. crude oil production to provide approximately two-thirds of total global liquids growth next year.  It is also important to note that U.S. crude oil tends to be a light, sweet grade, which will likely see an increase in global demand due to the implementation of the IMO 2020 regulations, further tilting market share.

U.S. Production Hits All-Time High in Q4

In September 2019, the U.S. became a net petroleum exporter, marking the first month ever since monthly records began in 1973.  To be exact, the U.S. exported 89,000 b/d more crude oil and petroleum products than it imported in the month of September.  Increasing U.S. crude oil production has resulted in a decrease in U.S. crude oil imports as well as the number of import sources.  Despite the reversal in September, the U.S. remains a net importer of crude oil, however, and 60% of imports come from Canada and Mexico.

The EIA expects U.S. crude oil production to average 13.2 million b/d in 2020, a slight increase from the 2019 level.  According to the STEO, slowing crude oil production growth results from a decline in drilling rigs over the past year, which is slated to continue into 2020.  Although the rig count is forecast to decline, the EIA forecasts an increase in production as rig efficiency and well-level productivity rises.

U.S. – China Trade Deal Phase One

In early December, the U.S. and China agreed on the first phase of a trade deal.  The Phase One agreement means the U.S. is suspending tariffs that were planned on $160 billion in Chinese imports.  In addition, the U.S. halved the September tariffs from 15% to 7.5%.  As a part of the Phase One deal, President Trump said Beijing has agreed “to many structural changes and massive purchases of Agricultural Product, Energy, and Manufactured Goods, plus much more.”  With regard to the trade deficit, U.S. officials signaled that China agreed to increase purchases of U.S. products and services by at least $200 billion over the next two years.  Phase One also addressed specific concerns subject to China’s intellectual property practices. President Trump explained that the U.S. and China would begin negotiations over the second phase of the trade deal rather quickly.  On the other side, China confirmed that a deal was reached and that the deal will be signed on January 15, 2020.

Interest Rates

By the end of October, the Fed had made three rate cuts in 2019 due in part to trade policy uncertainty.  In early November, following the last round of cuts, the Fed decided to hold rates steady.  After their meeting in early December, the Fed kept the federal funds rate between 1.5% and 1.75%.  The Federal Reserve remained optimistic about economic stability but emphasized that their actions will depend on future events.  Long-term interest rates began to rise over the quarter from the low of 1.47% for the 10-year Treasury in September.  Looking ahead to early 2020, rates are expected to remain flat with quiet Fed activity.

Middle East Tensions

An airstrike at the Baghdad Airport on January 3 killed top Iranian military commander, Major-General Qassem Soleimani.  Per the Department of Defense, the airstrike was conducted by the U.S. military at the direction of the President. WTI and Brent prices spiked nearly 4% on the breaking of the news.  Although further escalations are uncertain, moderate to low-level incursions in the first quarter of 2020 may be possible.  Analysts believe that Iran may resume targeting and harassment of oil shipping vessels in the Strait of Hormuz through which almost 25% of global oil consumption passes.  Iran sits at a natural choke point on the Strait, and has threatened to close Hormuz in times of heightened tension.  Disruption of this level of shipping could have large consequences on global oil demand and spikes in pricing if the U.S. and Iran continue to escalate military responses.

Conclusion

The next OPEC meeting is scheduled to occur on March 5, 2020, so decisions on increased, steady, or reduced production cuts on the supply side will not be made until the end of the first quarter.  Middle East tensions will be a highlight going into the 178th meeting if the Iran and U.S. conflict escalates.  Increased disruption could significantly affect global oil demand and price.  In the meantime, strong U.S. production is expected to continue in early 2020, and it is unclear whether the U.S. – China Phase One Trade Deal will lead to continued negotiations and cooperation between the two global players.

At Mercer Capital, we stay current with our analysis of the oil and gas industry both on a region-by-region basis within the U.S. as well as around the globe. This is crucial in a global commodity environment where supply, demand, and geopolitical factors have varying impacts on prices. We have assisted clients with diverse valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas industry in North America and internationally. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence.

Continue Reading

Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 03-10-2026
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of March 10, 2026

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Themes from the Q4 2025 Energy Earnings Calls
Fourth quarter 2025 earnings calls suggest an industry preparing for a transitional 2026, emphasizing organic inventory expansion, structural natural gas demand growth, and tightening service market fundamentals. Management teams appear focused less on short-term volatility and more on positioning for the next upcycle.
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
NAPE Summit 2026: Dealmaking at the Crossroads of Molecules, Electrons, and Minerals
Mercer Capital joined industry leaders at the 2026 NAPE Summit (NAPE Expo), held February 18th to 20th, at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. As with prior Expos, NAPE delivered a focused marketplace where conversations move quickly from “nice to meet you” to “what would it take to get this done?” This year, Bryce Erickson and David Smith represented Mercer Capital on the expo floor and across the conference programming, meeting with operators, minerals groups, capital providers, and advisors.If there was one defining characteristic of NAPE 2026, it was convergence. The industry’s traditional center of gravity, upstream oil and gas dealmaking, was still very much present. But the surrounding ecosystem is widening, as programming incorporated adjacent (and increasingly intertwined) sectors. The hubs for 2026, included Offshore, Data Centers, and Critical Minerals, as part of an event lineup designed to broaden the deal flow and participant mix. Below are our key takeaways from the conference, with a tour through the hub sessions and the themes that were emphasized.The Hub Sessions Told a Clear Story: Energy Is Becoming a Multi-Asset PortfolioThe 2026 NAPE hubs provided a useful lens into where capital is flowing and how industry priorities are evolving. This year’s programming demonstrated a market that still values traditional upstream opportunities, while increasingly integrating adjacent and emerging sectors into the broader deal landscape.Prospect Preview Hub: Showcasing OpportunitiesNAPE’s Prospect Preview Hub once again served as a platform for exhibitors to showcase available prospects on the expo floor, providing concise overviews of their technical merits and commercial potential. Presenters framed their investment thesis in a narrative that reflects how assets are marketed in a competitive transaction environment.Minerals & NonOp Hub: Strategies and TrendsThe Minerals & NonOp Hub discussions focused on market trends, financing strategies, and technology-driven approaches to sourcing and managing acquisition opportunities. Presentations in this hub addressed strategies, recent trends, technologies, and related developments.Offshore Hub: Long-Cycle Capital with Global ImplicationThe Offshore Hub highlighted exploration frontiers, development innovation, and the broader geopolitical context influencing offshore investment. Particular emphasis was placed on high-potential offshore regions, navigating environmental and regulatory frameworks, supply-demand trends, and the role of offshore energy in the global energy mix. Offshore projects require significant upfront investment and longer development timelines, which heighten sensitivity to regulatory stability, cost control, and commodity price outlook assumptions. In this sense, offshore dealmaking underscores how long-cycle assets must be evaluated differently from shorter-cycle onshore plays.Renewable Energy Hub: An Integrated FrameworkThe Renewable Energy Hub reflected an industry increasingly focused on integration rather than segmentation. Presentations centered on integrating renewables with traditional energy sources, hybrid project models, sustainability pathways with a focus on technology, and strategies for navigating evolving energy markets. Rather than viewing renewables as a standalone vertical, participants frequently discussed how renewable assets fit within broader portfolios that include natural gas, storage, and transmission infrastructure.Critical Minerals Hub: Supply Chain Strategy Comes to the ForefrontThe Critical Minerals Hub emphasized the strategic importance of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, and graphite within evolving energy supply chains. The three sessions - Exploration/Development, Market Dynamics, and Sustainability/Innovation - featured presentations focused on resource development pathways, supply chain positioning, sourcing practices, and recycling technologies. Unlike traditional upstream projects, critical mineral investments often face unique permitting, processing, and geopolitical risks. As capital flows into the space, differentiation increasingly depends on technical credibility and downstream integration potential.Data Center Hub: Power Demand Is Now a First-Order VariableThe Data Center Hub positioned data centers as a critical component of the global economy, emphasizing the sector’s immense and growing energy needs and the resulting opportunities for collaboration between energy and technology stakeholders. Sessions addressed (i) structuring power supply, interconnection, and grid compliance, (ii) managing data center development risk, and (iii) how rising energy demands impact data center development.In practical terms, this emerged in two ways. First, site selection and power availability are increasingly central to “deal conversations.” Co-location strategies, generation capacity, transmission access, and long-term power contracting are becoming key underwriting considerations. Second, infrastructure constraints are entering valuation frameworks. Power availability, interconnection queues, permitting timelines, and fuel optionality are no longer secondary factors; they directly influence project timing, risk, and expected returns.Our Takeaways: What We Heard Repeatedly on the FloorAcross hub sessions and meetings, three themes came up again and again:Infrastructure constraints are turning into valuation drivers. Power, pipelines, processing, and permitting are not background details—they’re often the gating items that shape cash flow timing, risk, and ultimate marketability.The market is hungry for clarity. Whether the topic is policy, commodity outlook, or capital availability, counterparties are placing a premium on deals with understandable risks and executable paths.Energy dealmaking is becoming “multi-asset” by default. Even when the transaction is traditional upstream, the conversation increasingly touches power, infrastructure, data, or minerals adjacency.Final ThoughtsMercer Capital has long valued NAPE as an event where real deal conversations happen and where shifting industry priorities can be identified early on. As the lines between upstream, infrastructure, power, and emerging energy/minerals continue to blur, independent valuation and transaction advisory services become even more important, since the hardest part isn’t building a model, it’s choosing the right assumptions.We have assisted many clients with various valuation needs in the upstream oil and gas space for both conventional and unconventional plays in North America and around the world. Contact a Mercer Capital professional to discuss your needs in confidence and learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Cart

Your cart is empty