Portfolio Valuation Services, Financial Sponsors

January 1, 2019

Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity & Venture Capital Marks & Trends

First Quarter 2019

The sell-off in risk assets last year points to why some wag on Wall Street decades ago coined the adage that bull markets take the escalator up and bear markets take the freight elevator down.  The sell-off in the fourth quarter was intense but not atypical. The unanswerable question then and today is whether the sell-off reflected the market discounting weaker earnings to come; illiquidity because heavy selling over the holidays was accentuated by the inability of large banks to commit capital via prop taking versus agency-based market making; or both fundamentals and liquidity.

The rebound in 2019 has been swifter than might be expected normally, but the rally in risk assets accelerated mid-quarter on the 180 degree pivot by Fed officials that further hikes to the Fed Funds target rate (and therefore 30/90-day LIBOR) are on hold until further notice.  

While the sell-off was brutal, it was not long enough to materially clip private equity values because public market pricing is but one of several methods used to value privately held assets (M&A data and DCF are among the most common).  As for credit, high yield has rallied sharply, too, after fears of the Fed hiking the economy into a recession eased. Plus, the global reach for yield is a long-running theme in the years since the GFC.

In short, 1Q19 was not a game changer for private equity and credit as seemed possible in December. Nonetheless, valuations may be subject to more scrutiny given a slowing economy and subdued M&A environment while a robust IPO calendar will allow public investors to have a say on how well (or not) private markets valued a number of high profile companies such as Lyft and Uber Technologies.

Download the full newsletter

Download
Download the newsletter

Continue Reading

Private Equity Marks Trends Summer 2026
Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity and Credit

Summer 2026

ILPA’s June 2026 draft Continuation Vehicle Guidance shifts the focus in GP-led secondary transactions from simply validating price to ensuring a transparent, well-governed sale process. Recognizing the rapid growth of continuation vehicles and the inherent conflicts created when GPs effectively act as both buyer and seller, the guidance emphasizes competitive bidding, early LPAC involvement, enhanced disclosures, longer election periods, and protections for rolling investors rather than relying solely on NAV or fairness opinions, though third-party valuations and fairness opinions remain an integral corporate governance practice to be followed.
ILPA’s New Continuation Vehicle Guidance: Process Is the New Price Protection
ILPA’s New Continuation Vehicle Guidance: Process Is the New Price Protection
ILPA’s June 2026 draft Continuation Vehicle Guidance shifts the focus in GP-led secondary transactions from simply validating price to ensuring a transparent, well-governed sale process.
Public Prices, Private Marks: What BDC Discounts  Are Signaling
Public Prices, Private Marks: What BDC Discounts Are Signaling
Publicly traded BDC discounts are signaling a disconnect between private credit valuations and market-based pricing, raising questions about whether private NAV marks are overstated or simply lagging reality. The failed Blue Owl transaction and rising secondary market activity highlight investor demand for liquidity and skepticism toward “sticky” valuations, as public markets imply meaningful discounts to stated NAVs. While these discounts reflect factors beyond asset values, such as leverage, fees, and sentiment, they still provide a real-time benchmark that valuation professionals cannot ignore. Absent a rebound in BDC prices, persistent gaps between public prices and NAVs indicate that NAVs are too high for public BDCs and private BDCs to the extent private BDCs hold similar loans.

Cart

Your cart is empty