Gift, Estate, & Income Tax Compliance

November 1, 2025

Value Matters® November 2025

Documenting Fair Market Value: Lessons from Estate of Rowland v. Commissioner

A Guide for Estate Planners

Executive Summary

Business valuations that are well-documented with support for the methodology used and how the concluded value was arrived at are at the core of effective estate tax planning. The recent decision in Estate of Rowland v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2025-76) reinforces that truth by showing how incomplete valuation documentation within Form 706 can jeopardize an otherwise straightforward portability election.

While Rowland involved a filing delay, the Court’s opinion makes clear that a deficient or poorly documented valuation can be just as damaging as a missed deadline. For estates holding closely held business interests, which are often significant and complex assets, the importance of thoroughly documenting the process of reaching fair market value cannot be overstated.

Background: The Portability Election and Form 706

Under Internal Revenue Code § 2010(c)(5)(A), a surviving spouse may use any portion of the deceased spouse’s unused estate tax exclusion (the deceased spousal unused exclusion, or “DSUE”) if the first spouse’s executor properly elects portability.

That election must be made through a timely filed and complete Form 706. Even when an estate owes no estate tax, the return must contain detailed and supportable valuations of every asset, including business interests. Omitting or estimating values exposes the election to IRS challenge and potential invalidation.

Facts of the Case

Fay Rowland died in 2016, leaving an estate approximately $3.7 million below the filing threshold. Her executor obtained a six-month extension but filed Form 706 nearly six months after the extended deadline.

The return also lacked key valuation detail: 1) schedules reflected only estimated totals, not fair market values for individual assets; and 2) the executor claimed the “relaxed reporting” exception for assets passing to a surviving spouse, yet a portion of the estate passed to grandchildren’s trusts, making the exception inapplicable.

When the surviving spouse’s estate (Billy Rowland) later claimed Fay’s DSUE, the IRS denied the election, arguing the filing was neither timely nor properly prepared. The Tax Court agreed, which lead to Billy’s Estate paying approximately $1.5 million in additional taxes.

The Court’s Reasoning

Timeliness Was Not Enough

The Court held the return untimely, but even if it had met the filing window, it failed the requirement of being “complete and properly prepared.” Completeness, the Court emphasized, includes providing valuation information sufficient for the IRS to verify reported amounts and compute the DSUE accurately.

Valuation Documentation Is Integral to Completeness

Treas. Reg. § 20.2010-2(a)(7) requires a Form 706 filed solely to elect portability to include the same detail as a taxable return, except for assets passing entirely to a spouse or charity. The Rowland estate’s generalized estimates prevented the IRS from evaluating the DSUE computation.

The Court rejected arguments of substantial compliance and equitable relief, holding that valuation documentation is not simply a procedural technicality, but rather a statutory prerequisite.

Why Business Valuations Matter

For many families, closely held business interests comprise a large share of estate value. These assets require specialized valuation under Revenue Ruling 59-60. A well-supported valuation not only establishes compliance but also enhances the credibility of the entire filing.

A defensible business valuation requires:

  • Identifying the rights and benefits of the interest being valued (control, transfer restrictions, etc.).

  • Using relevant market evidence, including public comparables and transaction data.

  • Applying sound financial analysis that addresses expected cash flows, risk, and growth prospects.

  • Reporting clearly and effectively to the IRS and other readers.

Documentation: The Bridge Between Valuation and Compliance

The Rowland decision underscores that a valuation unsupported by documentation is no valuation at all. A properly prepared Form 706 should therefore include:

  • Narrative descriptions of each business interest, outlining ownership, structure, and rights.

  • Detailed valuation schedules explaining how conclusions were reached.

  • Supporting exhibits, such as financial statements and methodology summaries.

  • Explicit reference to appraisal standards that demonstrate compliance with USPAP and Treasury requirements.

Without these elements, a return fails the “complete and properly prepared” standard which is exactly what happened in Rowland.

Practical Guidance for Estate Planners

  1. Engage Qualified Appraisers Early. Business interests should be appraised by professionals experienced in federal transfer tax matters and IRS examinations.

  2. Coordinate Across Disciplines. Attorneys, accountants, and appraisers should align on ownership structures and entity specifics to ensure consistent reporting.

  3. Avoid Estimates or Prior-Year Values. Fair market value is determined as of the date of death; using approximations risks inconsistency with IRS standards.

  4. Explain Discounts and Assumptions. Clearly document the rationale for any discount for lack of control or marketability.

  5. Maintain Comprehensive Records. Preserve valuation reports, source data, and correspondence to support the filing if later reviewed or aud.

Conclusion

The Estate of Rowland v. Commissioner decision delivers a clear message: Form 706 filings must contain credible, well-documented fair market value determinations for all assets, particularly business interests, or risk invalidation. Portability hinges not only on timeliness but on the completeness and substantiation of reported values. The strength of the filing lies in the quality of its appraisals and the documentation supporting them.

At Mercer Capital, we integrate these principles into every estate and gift tax engagement, ensuring our valuation opinions are technically sound, clearly presented, and defensible which positions clients for successful outcomes under IRS scrutiny.

Valuations are a critical element of successful tax planning strategies and objective third-party valuation opinions are vital. Since 1982, Mercer Capital has provided objective valuations for estate, gift, and income tax matters across virtually every industry sector. To discuss your valuation needs in confidence, please contact one of our professionals .

Download
Download the Newsletter

Continue Reading

July 2026 | Complex Governance Structures in Gift  and Estate Tax Valuation
Value Matters® June 2026

Complex Governance Structures in Gift and Estate Tax Valuation

In valuations for gift or estate tax reporting purposes, the subject of the appraisal is not simply a percentage ownership interest, but the specific ownership interest being transferred, together with the legal and economic rights attached to it.
WEBINAR: Charitable Gifts of Business Interests
UPCOMING WEBINAR: Charitable Gifts of Business Interests - Planning, Timing, and Valuation
Charitable gifts involving closely held business interests and other complex assets can create meaningful planning opportunities.
Mercer Capital to Sponsor The Florida Bar’s 44th Annual Attorney/Trust Officer Liaison Conference
Mercer Capital to Sponsor The Florida Bar’s 44th Annual Attorney/Trust Officer Liaison Conference
Mercer Capital is pleased to sponsor The Florida Bar’s 44th Annual Attorney/Trust Officer Liaison Conference, taking place July 30 to August 1, 2026, at The Breakers in Palm Beach. Matthew R. Crow, CFA, ASA, and Thomas C. Insalaco, CFA, ASA, will represent the firm at the conference.Presented by The Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section of The Florida Bar, the annual conference brings together attorneys, trust officers, and other professionals for focused education on current trust and estate issues. The 2026 program includes sessions on trustee discharge, fiduciary accounting, undue influence, legislative updates, technology and financial exploitation, and trust and estate case law.Matt Crow is the CEO of Mercer Capital and leads the firm’s Investment Management Industry team. He works with RIAs, independent trust companies, broker-dealers, and investment consulting firms on valuation matters related to corporate planning and reorganization, transactions, employee stock ownership plans, tax issues, and valuations of intangible assets, options, and assets subject to contractual restrictions. He is a regular contributor to Mercer Capital’s RIA Valuation Insights Blog.Tom Insalaco is a Senior Vice President and a member of Mercer Capital’s Gift, Estate, and Income Tax Planning and Compliance practice group. Since 2008, he has provided valuation services across a broad range of industries and matters, including gift and estate tax, business succession and exit planning, and buy-sell agreements.Mercer Capital works with owners, fiduciaries, and professional advisors on valuation and advisory matters involving trusts, estates, tax planning, and disputes. The firm is pleased to support programs that help professionals navigate the financial issues that arise in complex estate and trust matters.Mercer Capital looks forward to connecting with attendees in Palm Beach and participating in this year’s conference. Visit the conference’s website to learn more: https://member.floridabar.org/s/lt-event?id=a1RWQ00000RcEFJ2A3.

Cart

Your cart is empty