Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas

September 4, 2018

Oilfield Service Valuations

Missing The Party Or Just Fashionably Late?

Latecomers are inevitable at parties. They skulk in at the end, missing out on most of the fun, food and games that everyone else has been enjoying. Yet, savvy socialites aim to arrive fashionably late, after the labor of getting the party going but still in time to enjoy the night.

When it comes to valuations, are oilfield servicers late to the proverbial oil patch valuation gala or just in time to enjoy the recovery?

Energy Sector Performance Improving

Since oil prices fell off a cliff in the summer of 2014, most other energy sectors have been climbing back in various phases of recovery:

  • E&P company valuations are recovering as companies have benefited from increases in production, escalating acreage values, lower breakeven prices and a recuperating oil price. This is especially true in the Permian Basin. In fact, activity and production in West Texas is growing so fast that existing pipelines and infrastructure struggle to keep up.
  • Meanwhile, US refiners, feasting on the spread between Brent and WTI, continue to see valuation gains as well. Refineries are busting at the seams, with current utilizations over 98%, and acquisitions abound. Refinery performance appears sustainable for the short to intermediate term, but in the long run, capacity may be a limiting factor.
  • Even midstream and pipeline valuations, after taking a beating through the end of 2015, are recovering nicely. The current West Texas hydrocarbon traffic jam presents a growth opportunity for this sector.

Past Oilfield Service Performance

Oilfield service providers, drillers, pumpers and equipment providers enabled E&P companies to make impressive efficiency leaps. So, where do they stand today? One lens through which to view things is the OSX index–a popular metric to track sector performance.

Since mid-2014, the OSX index does not exactly portray an inspiring comeback by oilfield service companies. In fact, looking at the index alone might lead one to think oilfield servicers have not even received an invitation to this reputed party, much less arrived. Earnings sunk in 2015 and bottomed out in 2016 as a result of producers cutting drilling and completion costs. Balance sheets went through significant write downs, impairments and asset sales. Not surprisingly, bankruptcies for the sector peaked in 2016 with 72 oilfield service companies filing for bankruptcy, up from 39 the year prior. It was a mess, to say the least. Oh, but how things have changed in the past two years.

Current Oilfield Service Performance

Higher oil prices, coupled with lower breakeven costs for producers, are making drillers, completers and a host of other servicers busier than a gopher on a golf course. Capex budgets for E&P companies, known as lead indicators for drillers and contractors, have taken off. While dormant for decades, proven drilling locations (PUDs) now multiply in light of new fracking technologies and their resultant economics. Drilling and completion budgets are not only growing for operators, but an increasing percentage of those budgets are being spent in West Texas.

Utilization Rates and Day Rates

Specifically, as it pertains to oilfield service companies, two key metrics, utilization rates and day rates, have begun to align in a way not seen since 2014.

By the end of 2017, utilization rates for certain rigs averaged around 80%, or almost fully utilized considering necessary downtime and transition from one drilling location to another. However, things are currently so hot that utilization rates have now risen to over 90%.

Day rates, the measure of how much a servicer can charge an operator for every day the rig is operating, have been slower to increase. Increases in day rates started to move upward in the last six months or so. Estimates suggest that day rates will notch up 10-15% by the end of 2018. This is good news for oilfield servicers.

Valuation Turnaround

Now that utilization rates and day rates are both trending upward, valuations should logically respond and by certain aspects, they are.

Take, for example, a selection of guideline company groups: onshore drillers and pressure pumpers (fracking companies). One way to observe the degree of relative value changes is to look at enterprise value (sans cash) relative to total book value of net invested capital (debt and equity) held by the company or “BVIC”. Any multiple over 1.0x indicates valuations above what net capital investors have placed into the firm, which for drillers and pumpers is a notable threshold.

While 2016 was an anomaly (due to the significant balance sheet changes mentioned above), the rest of the time frame shows a clear trend. In 2015, with a multiple below 1.0x, investors didn’t expect to get an adequate return on the capital deployed at these companies. However, as 2017 came to a close and now moving into mid-2018, that trend has reversed. All except Parker Drilling have met or exceeded their 2014 multiples, and the average is around 1.2x. This suggests that the market is recognizing intangible value again for assets such as developed technology, customer relationships, trade names and goodwill. For pressure pumping and fracking concentrated businesses, which are more directly tied into the value expansion in the oil patch, the trend is clear. Intangible asset valuations have grown even faster, more heavily weighted towards pumpers’ developed technology that is driving demand for these companies’ services. However, the recent infrastructure logjam in West Texas has pushed multiples lower.  Nonetheless, the market has been recognizing the value contributions of these companies.

Conclusion

To be clear, nearly all of these companies had to shrink their balance sheets to get these multiples in line. This explains why some of the data is not as meaningful in 2016. However, it appears that’s what was necessary in light of the shift in the market.

Overall rig counts have shifted downward since 2014 and are currently nowhere near prior levels, thereby forcing these companies to shed assets in recent years. That’s the price of market efficiency. However, with those challenges no longer weighing them down, some oilfield services companies may be finally arriving at the valuation party.

Remember the initial question posed in this post: When it comes to valuations, are oilfield servicers late to the proverbial oil patch valuation gala or just in time to enjoy the recovery? Maybe the question to ask is: How much time is left before the celebration ends?


Originally appeared on Forbes.com.

Continue Reading

Mercer Capital Sponsors ASA Houston’s 2026 Energy Valuation Conference
Mercer Capital Sponsors ASA Houston’s 2026 Energy Valuation Conference
Mercer Capital is pleased to serve as a Gold Sponsor of the 2026 Energy Valuation Conference, hosted by the Houston Chapter of the American Society of Appraisers. The conference will take place on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at The Briar Club in Houston, Texas, with both in-person attendance and live webcast options available. Bryce Erickson, ASA, MRICS; J. David Smith, CFA, ASA; and Andrew B. Frew, ASA, ABV, will attend on behalf of Mercer Capital.Now in its 16th year, the Energy Valuation Conference brings together appraisers, accountants, financial analysts, petroleum engineers, and many other professionals working across the energy sector. The conference is designed as a multi-disciplinary forum addressing valuation techniques and issues across the energy industry, including upstream, midstream, downstream, renewables, power generation, tax, governance, and emerging market considerations.This year’s program will address a range of current valuation topics affecting the energy industry, including energy transition, transaction activity, capital markets, and valuation considerations across upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors.Bryce Erickson is a Managing Director at Mercer Capital and leads the firm’s energy industry practice. Since 1998, he has led approximately one thousand engagements across diverse purposes, including gift and estate tax planning, litigation support, mergers and acquisitions, buyouts, buy-sell agreements, financial reporting, purchase price allocation, financing, and business planning. He regularly publishes on oil and gas industry topics in Mercer Capital’s Energy Valuation Insights blog. He is also a contributor to Forbes.com’s Energy sector.J. David Smith is a Senior Vice President at Mercer Capital and a senior member of the firm’s energy practice. He provides valuation services for tax planning, transactional purposes, and financial reporting. David is also a regular contributor to Mercer Capital’s Energy Valuation Insights blog.Andrew B. Frew is a Vice President at Mercer Capital and has nearly 25 years of business valuation experience. He has been involved with hundreds of valuation and related engagements across numerous industries and values businesses and business interests for gift and estate tax, charitable giving, buy/sell agreements, mergers and acquisitions, business succession and exit planning, and litigation support purposes. Andy also contributes regularly to Mercer Capital’s Energy Valuation Insights blog.Mercer Capital works with energy companies, mineral and royalty owners, oilfield services businesses, investors, attorneys, accountants, and other advisors on valuation and financial advisory matters. The firm provides business valuation, asset valuation, litigation support, transaction advisory, financial reporting valuation, and tax valuation services across the energy sector, helping clients address complex financial questions with clear, independent, and well-supported analysis.Mercer Capital looks forward to supporting the conference and connecting with energy valuation professionals and industry leaders in Houston. Additional information about the 2026 Energy Valuation Conference is available at https://energyvaluationconference.org/.For more information about Mercer Capital’s experience and expertise in the oil & gas sector, visit https://mercercapital.com/industries/energy-power/oil-gas/.
EP First Quarter 2026 Eagle Ford
E&P First Quarter 2026

Region Focus: Eagle Ford

Eagle Ford // The Eagle Ford exhibited modest production growth over the past year, broadly in line with other major basins, as output remained within a relatively narrow range. This stability reflects the basin’s maturity, with limited variability in production despite declining rig counts and continued capital discipline among operators.
Just Released: Q1 2026 Oil & Gas Industry Newsletter
Just Released: Q1 2026 Oil & Gas Industry Newsletter

Region Focus: Eagle Ford

The Eagle Ford exhibited modest production growth over the past year, broadly in line with other major basins, as output remained within a relatively narrow range. This stability reflects the basin’s maturity, with limited variability in production despite declining rig counts and continued capital discipline among operators.

Cart

Your cart is empty