Corporate Valuation, Oil & Gas
Energy-Earnings-Calls-1-1.png

January 27, 2022

Q1-Q3 2021 Themes From Oilfield Service Company Earnings Calls

Nuances of the Upstream Perspective

As our readers are well aware, Mercer Capital tracks and reviews themes from the quarterly earnings calls ofE&P operatorsand mineral aggregators, providing key insights into the upstream perspective on U.S. oil and gas.  In this post, we look at oilfield service (OFS) company earnings calls for the first three quarters of 2021.  Looking forward, we will likely incorporate OFS earnings calls in our quarterly survey of themes from the public oil and gas sector, using this post as a reference point for the upcoming round of Q4 2021 calls.

We typically review earnings calls for 3 to 8 companies among the E&P operators and mineral aggregators each.  Likewise, we look forward to reviewing calls for a roster of approximately 7 OFS companies that operate in the primary onshore U.S. basins covered by Mercer Capital.  In this inaugural survey, however, we focus on Q1 through Q3 earnings calls for just two OFS companies – Halliburton and Ranger Energy Services.  We follow the earnings call themes for these two companies, who represent some of the largest and smallest (by market cap) public OFS companies, through the first three quarters of 2021 to get a sense of how OFS industry dynamics have evolved over the past year.

Promoting ESG Initiatives

In our review of Q1 2021 earnings call themes among E&P Operators, we saw a continued trend (from Q4 and Q3 2020 E&P operator earnings call themes) of emphasizing and discussing the progress of various ESG initiatives.  This theme was absent in the Q2 2021 E&P earnings calls, and not a significant theme in the Q3 2021 E&P earnings calls.  However, OFS operators were clear to point out their contribution towards various ESG initiatives throughout the first three quarters of 2021.

“We're excited about the progress of Halliburton Labs, our clean-energy accelerator.  In the first quarter, we announced Halliburton Labs' inaugural group of participating companies.  They are working on solutions for transforming organic and plastic waste to renewable power; recycling of lithium-ion batteries; and converting carbon dioxide, water, and renewable electricity into a hydrogen-rich platform chemical.” – Jeff Miller, President & CEO, Halliburton [Q1]

“We have successfully completed gas processing jobs for both dual fuel and e-frac fleet and anticipate more to come.  There are several rewarding attributes to this transition.  We are tangibly contributing to the ESG efforts of our industry.” – Darron Anderson, CEO, Ranger Energy Services [Q1]

“On the Processing Solutions side, we continue to expect our customers' ESG mandate to drive an uptick in both the traditional flare gas capture use and newer fracturing dual-fuel and e-fleet generation fuel supply.  We continue to have pilot program success on fuel supply projects, but have yet to sign that elusive long-term contract.  Stay tuned here as stronger commodity pricing, incremental flare gas, emission regulation and the build-out and adoption of dual fuel and electric frac fleet are all tailwinds for our Processing Solutions segment.” – Bill Austin, Interim CEO & Chairman, Ranger Energy Services [Q2]

“In the third quarter, Halliburton completed an all-electric pad operation on a multi-year contract with Chesapeake Energy in the Marcellus Shale.” – Jeff Miller, President & CEO, Halliburton [Q3]

Opportunistic Acquisitions & Increased Consolidation of Smaller Operators

While mineral aggregators were active on the M&A front in Q3 2021, with a favorable sentiment towards expanding their holdings since Q1, E&P operators were relatively quiet in the Eagle Ford and Appalachian basins, a bit more active in the Bakken, and chomping at the bit in the Permian.  OFS operators, particularly those for whom incremental expansions carry more weight, kept their eyes on the horizon over 2021.

“Our acquisition strategy has been fixed and simple.  We are focusing on potential counterparties with top-tier assets, who have a reputation for best-in-class service quality.  We are looking at both bolt-ons to our existing service lines and complementary service lines that extend our current core service offerings.  Tactically, we believe in being opportunistic.” – Darron Anderson, CEO, Ranger Energy Services [Q1]

“As we said in the prepared remarks, many of these small operators, frankly, we believe, lived and died on the PPP.  They priced things that keep them alive and trade dollars.  We think by signaling, and more than signaling that there's consolidation, and we think there'll be other players that will try to consolidate.” – Bill Austin, Interim CEO & Chairman, Ranger Energy Services [Q2]

Leverage to Increase Service Pricing

The greatest theme of 2021 from the perspective of E&P operators and mineral aggregators was the upward trajectory out of the crude abyssfrom 2020.  What a difference a year makes, both in hindsight and for the road ahead.  This was probably most present with OFS operators, which likely hit an inflection point from riding the wave as price-takers to potentially commanding the wave as price-makers in the near-term or at least being able to take more than what they can just get.

“Service pricing improvement is the final step.  We're not there yet, but we see positive signs of market rebalancing that should drive future pricing improvements.  Total fracturing equipment capacity has limited room to grow in the current pricing environment.” – Jeff Miller, President & CEO, Halliburton [Q1]

“I believe equipment availability will tighten much faster than most people think.  In multiple product lines, we believe that equipment supply will fall behind anticipated demand.  Today, both drilling and completions equipment are nearing tightness in North America.” – Jeff Miller, President & CEO, Halliburton [Q2]

“Our primary near-term objective is driving margin expansion.  Our largest near-term lever here is pricing.” – Bill Austin, Interim CEO & Chairman, Ranger Energy Services [Q2]

“I'll give you two anecdotes.  One customer was a smaller customer, that we went and said that these need to be the new rig rates for us to continue, working beyond what we had committed to. They were pretty upset.  Used some pretty colorful language.  And we said, we're going to okay, well, we will finish up our jobs that we committed to, and we'll walk away.  Half an hour, they call back and agreed to it, right?  So clearly, our view is that they got on the phone, called around, and realized that there wasn't anything available.  And another one with a much bigger customer said that they wanted to add additional rigs.  They were trying to use that as a bargaining chip for basically a volume discount.  We very quickly said we'll talk about additional rigs only, until we get our first pricing, basically the first wave of price increases.  It's been a multiple conversation event, but I think we’re getting there.” – Stuart Bodden, President & CEO, Ranger Energy Services [Q3]

Conclusion

Mercer Capital has its finger on the pulse of the oil and gas sector.  As upstream operators, mineral aggregators, and the OFS operators that support them regain their footing, we take a holistic perspective to bring you thoughtful analysis and commentary regarding the hydrocarbon stream. For more targeted energy sector analysis to meet your valuation needs, please contact the Mercer Capital Oil & Gas Team.

Continue Reading

Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Defying the Cycle: Haynesville Production Strength in a Shifting Gas Market
Haynesville shale production defied broader market softness in 2025, leading major U.S. basins with double-digit year-over-year growth despite heightened volatility and sub-cycle drilling activity. Efficiency gains, DUC drawdowns, and Gulf Coast demand dynamics allowed operators to sustain output even as natural gas prices fluctuated sharply.
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Haynesville Shale M&A Update: 2025 in Review
Key TakeawaysHaynesville remains a strategic LNG-linked basin. 2025 transactions emphasized long-duration natural gas exposure and proximity to Gulf Coast export infrastructure, reinforcing the basin’s importance in meeting global LNG demand.International utilities drove much of the activity. Japanese power and gas companies pursued direct upstream ownership, signaling a shift from traditional offtake agreements toward greater control over U.S. gas supply.M&A was selective but meaningful in scale and intent. While overall deal volume was limited, announced transactions and reported negotiations reflected deliberate, long-term positioning rather than opportunistic shale consolidation.OverviewM&A activity in the Haynesville Shale during 2025 was marked by strategic, LNG-linked transactions and renewed international investor interest in U.S. natural gas assets. While investors remained selective relative to prior shale upcycles, transactions that did occur reflected a clear pattern: buyers focused on long-duration gas exposure, scale, and proximity to Gulf Coast export markets rather than short-term development upside.Producers and capital providers increasingly refocused efforts on the Haynesville basin during the year, including raising capital to acquire both operating assets and mineral positions. This renewed attention followed a period of subdued transaction activity and underscored the basin’s continued relevance within global natural gas portfolios.Although the Haynesville did not experience the breadth of consolidation seen in some oil-weighted plays, the size, counterparties, and strategic motivations behind 2025 transactions reinforced the basin’s role as a long-term supply source for LNG-linked demand.Announced Upstream TransactionsTokyo Gas (TG Natural Resources) / ChevronIn April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its U.S. joint venture TG Natural Resources, entered into an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Chevron’s East Texas natural gas assets for $525 million. The assets include significant Haynesville exposure and were acquired through a combination of cash consideration and capital commitments.The transaction was characterized as part of Tokyo Gas’s broader strategy to secure long-term U.S. natural gas supply and expand its upstream footprint. The deal reflects a growing trend among international utilities to obtain direct exposure to U.S. shale gas through ownership interests rather than relying solely on long-term offtake contracts or third-party supply arrangements.From an M&A perspective, the transaction highlights continued willingness among major operators to monetize non-core or minority positions while retaining operational involvement, and it underscores the Haynesville’s attractiveness to buyers with a long-term, strategic view of gas demand.JERA / Williams & GEP Haynesville IIIn October 2025, JERA Co., Japan’s largest power generator, announced an agreement to acquire Haynesville shale gas production assets from Williams Companies and GEP Haynesville II, a joint venture between GeoSouthern Energy and Blackstone. The transaction was valued at approximately $1.5 billion.This acquisition marked JERA’s first direct investment in U.S. shale gas production, representing a notable expansion of the company’s upstream exposure and reinforcing JERA’s interest in securing supply from regions with strong connectivity to U.S. LNG export infrastructure.This transaction further illustrates the appeal of the Haynesville to international buyers seeking stable, scalable gas assets and highlights the role of upstream M&A as a tool for portfolio diversification among global utilities and energy companies.Reported Negotiations (Not Announced)Mitsubishi / Aethon Energy ManagementIn June 2025, Reuters reported that Mitsubishi Corp. was in discussions to acquire Aethon Energy Management, a privately held operator with substantial Haynesville production and midstream assets. The potential transaction was reported to be valued at approximately $8 billion, though Reuters emphasized that talks were ongoing and that no deal had been finalized at the time.While the transaction was not announced during 2025, the reported discussions were notable for both their scale and the identity of the potential buyer. Aethon has long been viewed as one of the largest private platforms in the Haynesville, and any transaction involving the company would represent a significant consolidation event within the basin.The reported talks underscored the depth of international interest in Haynesville-oriented platforms and highlighted the potential for large-scale transactions even in an otherwise measured M&A environment.ConclusionWhile overall deal volume remained selective, the transactions and reported negotiations in 2025 reflected sustained global interest in U.S. natural gas assets with long-term relevance. Collectively, the transactions and negotiations discussed above point to a Haynesville M&A landscape driven less by opportunistic consolidation and more by deliberate, long-term positioning. As global energy portfolios continue to evolve, the Haynesville basin remains a focal point for strategic investment, particularly for buyers seeking exposure tied to U.S. natural gas supply and LNG export linkages.
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released-Data as of 06-11-2025
Mineral Aggregator Valuation Multiples Study Released

With Market Data as of June 11, 2025

Mercer Capital has thoughtfully analyzed the corporate and capital structures of the publicly traded mineral aggregators to derive meaningful indications of enterprise value. We have also calculated valuation multiples based on a variety of metrics, including distributions and reserves, as well as earnings and production on both a historical and forward-looking basis.

Cart

Your cart is empty